The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the OnePlus Ace 3V and vivo Y100t represent compelling options. The Ace 3V brings Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 to the table, while the Y100t leverages the established Mediatek Dimensity 8200. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device delivers the best value for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Ace 3V emerges as the stronger choice. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 offers a noticeable performance uplift, particularly in sustained workloads and gaming, and its optimized power efficiency complements the 100W charging. While the vivo Y100t boasts faster 120W charging, the Ace 3V’s overall package is more refined.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 23 | 2024, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 28 | Available. Released 2024, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 162.7 x 75.2 x 8.5 mm (6.41 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1100 nits (HBM), 2150 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7675 Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 732 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired
Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Purple, Gray |
| Models | V2314A | PJF110 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 260 EUR |
vivo Y100t
- Faster chipset: Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 offers superior performance.
- More efficient architecture: Better battery life potential.
- Advanced ISP: Improved image processing and video capabilities.
- Slower charging: 100W is good, but not as fast as 120W.
- Potentially higher price: Newer chipset often translates to a higher cost.
OnePlus Ace 3V
- Ultra-fast charging: 120W wired charging is a major convenience.
- Competitive performance: Dimensity 8200 is still a capable chipset.
- Potentially lower price: May offer better value for budget-conscious buyers.
- Older chipset: Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 offers a noticeable performance advantage.
- Less efficient: Dimensity 8200 may consume more power.
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are detailed in the provided data, so we must infer. Given the price bracket, both likely feature AMOLED panels. However, the Ace 3V, being a newer release, may benefit from a higher peak brightness and potentially a more efficient panel. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3’s ISP could also contribute to more accurate color reproduction. The absence of LTPO information suggests neither phone offers adaptive refresh rates, which would be a notable omission in this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is limited. However, OnePlus generally focuses on image processing and computational photography, potentially giving the Ace 3V an edge in dynamic range and low-light performance. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3’s ISP is more advanced, enabling faster image processing and potentially better video stabilization. The Y100t’s camera performance will likely be solid, but the Ace 3V has the potential to deliver more refined and versatile results.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 3V’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a 1x Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 2.8GHz, alongside 4x Cortex-A720 performance cores and 3x Cortex-A520 efficiency cores. This architecture is a step ahead of the vivo Y100t’s Dimensity 8200 (4nm), which features a 1x Cortex-A78, 3x Cortex-A78, and 4x Cortex-A55. The X4 core in the Snapdragon offers superior single-core performance, while the newer A720 cores provide a more substantial boost in multi-core tasks. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance on the Ace 3V. The Snapdragon’s Adreno GPU will also outperform the Mali-G610 MC4 in the Dimensity 8200.
Battery Life
The vivo Y100t’s 120W wired charging is its standout feature, promising incredibly fast top-ups. While the OnePlus Ace 3V’s 100W charging is still rapid (0-100% in 26 minutes), the Y100t will be significantly quicker. However, battery life is also influenced by chipset efficiency. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3’s improved power management could offset the Y100t’s charging advantage, resulting in comparable real-world battery endurance despite potential differences in battery capacity (not specified).
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y100t if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds and frequently top up your phone throughout the day. Its 120W charging is a significant advantage. Buy the OnePlus Ace 3V if you value sustained performance for gaming and demanding applications, and appreciate a more modern chipset architecture with improved power efficiency. The Ace 3V is the better all-rounder.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 in the OnePlus Ace 3V handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 is well-equipped to handle Genshin Impact and other graphically intensive games at high settings. Its Adreno GPU provides a significant performance boost over the Dimensity 8200, allowing for smoother frame rates and a more enjoyable gaming experience. However, sustained performance will depend on the phone’s thermal management capabilities.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the vivo Y100t compared to the 100W charging on the OnePlus Ace 3V in real-world use?
While both offer fast charging, the 120W on the Y100t will noticeably reduce charging times. Expect a 0-100% charge in under 30 minutes, potentially closer to 20-25 minutes, compared to the Ace 3V’s 26 minutes. The difference is most significant in the initial stages of charging, with the Y100t gaining a larger percentage of battery life in the first 10-15 minutes.
❓ Does the Dimensity 8200 in the vivo Y100t tend to throttle under sustained load, like during long gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8200 is a capable chip, but it can be prone to some throttling under prolonged heavy load due to thermal limitations. While the 4nm process helps, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 generally exhibits better thermal efficiency, leading to less performance degradation over extended gaming sessions.
