The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor X50 GT and vivo Y100t represent compelling options for users seeking performance without a flagship price tag. This comparison focuses on the core differences – the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the X50 GT versus the Dimensity 8200 in the Y100t – and how those translate into real-world benefits, particularly regarding speed, battery life, and charging.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Honor X50 GT is the better choice thanks to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. However, the vivo Y100t’s 120W charging is a game-changer for those who value minimizing downtime, making it ideal for power users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 23 | 2024, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 28 | Available. Released 2024, January 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, ultrasound proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired
Reverse wired | 35W wired
7.5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, Silver |
| Models | V2314A | ALP-AN00 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 260 EUR |
vivo Y100t
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Potentially better thermal management for sustained gaming
- Advanced ISP for improved image processing
- Significantly slower 35W charging
- May have slightly lower battery life during heavy use
Honor X50 GT
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Competitive Dimensity 8200 performance for everyday tasks
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Lower peak performance compared to Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Potentially more throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely feature AMOLED panels. The Honor X50 GT, being positioned slightly higher, may benefit from a higher peak brightness or a more refined color calibration. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests a standard 120Hz refresh rate, impacting battery consumption during intensive use.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups geared towards social media and everyday photography. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) generally offers more advanced image processing capabilities, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) makes it difficult to assess video recording quality. It's reasonable to assume the X50 GT will have a slight edge in overall camera performance due to the superior ISP.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X50 GT’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, designed for peak performance. This is contrasted by the vivo Y100t’s Dimensity 8200 (4nm), which utilizes a Cortex-A78 prime core at 3.1 GHz. While the Dimensity 8200’s core clock is higher, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s architecture, particularly the X2 core, provides superior single-core performance. The Snapdragon’s Adreno 730 GPU also offers a significant advantage in graphics processing, crucial for gaming. Both utilize 4nm fabrication, offering good efficiency, but the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its thermal management, potentially leading to less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The vivo Y100t’s 120W wired charging is its standout feature. This allows for a full charge in under 20 minutes, a significant advantage over the Honor X50 GT’s 35W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference. The X50 GT’s 7.5W reverse wired charging is a niche feature, useful for topping up accessories, but the Y100t also offers reverse wired charging, though the wattage isn't specified. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s efficiency may contribute to slightly better battery life during moderate use, but the Y100t’s charging speed is a more impactful benefit for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y100t if you need incredibly fast charging and prioritize minimizing time tethered to a wall outlet. Its Dimensity 8200 is still a capable performer for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the Honor X50 GT if you prefer maximum processing power for demanding games and applications, and are willing to trade off charging speed for that extra performance headroom.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor X50 GT overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its relatively good thermal efficiency, but overheating can still occur during extended gaming. Honor likely implemented thermal management solutions, such as vapor chamber cooling, to mitigate this. However, the vivo Y100t’s Dimensity 8200 may throttle sooner under the same conditions due to its slightly less efficient architecture.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the vivo Y100t with the 120W charger?
vivo claims the Y100t can charge from 0-100% in approximately 19 minutes with the 120W charger. Real-world results may vary slightly depending on ambient temperature and battery health, but it remains significantly faster than the Honor X50 GT’s 35W charging.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and Dimensity 8200 noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For typical daily usage, the performance difference will be minimal. Both chipsets are more than capable of handling everyday tasks smoothly. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s advantage becomes more apparent in demanding applications like gaming and video editing.
