The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y100 and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options. The Y100 aims for a balance of features and affordability, while the Poco F5 Pro aggressively targets performance with a flagship-level chipset. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide which best suits your priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset delivers significantly faster processing and graphics capabilities. However, the vivo Y100 offers a respectable experience for everyday tasks and benefits from a slightly more streamlined software experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 16 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 16 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 7.7 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | IP54, dust and water resistant
Color changing back panel color | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 98.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | - | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 60% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Metal Black, Twilight Gold, Pacific Blue | Black, White |
| Models | V2239 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | € 97.26 | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y100
- More affordable price point
- Balanced feature set for everyday use
- Potentially more streamlined software experience
- Significantly weaker processor
- Less impressive display brightness
- Slower charging speeds
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Much brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster wired and wireless charging
- Potentially higher price
- Software may be less refined than vivo's Funtouch OS
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1059 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Y100. This translates to superior visibility outdoors. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the higher peak brightness of the Poco F5 Pro is a tangible advantage. The Y100’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a more standard LCD or AMOLED panel, potentially lacking features like LTPO for adaptive refresh rates found in higher-end devices. This impacts power consumption and smoothness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for both. The Poco F5 Pro, given its flagship positioning, likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The vivo Y100’s camera setup is likely more focused on affordability. Without specific details like sensor size and aperture, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Poco F5 Pro’s processing power will likely result in better image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The inclusion of OIS on the Poco F5 Pro would be a significant advantage for video recording.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo Y100’s MediaTek Dimensity 900 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 and A510 cores, offering significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance. The Dimensity 900, with its Cortex-A78 and A55 cores, is capable but falls behind in demanding tasks. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While RAM specifications aren't provided, the Poco F5 Pro is likely to benefit from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are markedly different. The Poco F5 Pro supports 67W wired charging (PD3.0, QC3+), reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes, and even offers 30W wireless charging (50% in 32 minutes). The vivo Y100’s 44W wired charging, while respectable, is slower, taking 30 minutes to reach 60%. This faster charging capability gives the Poco F5 Pro a significant convenience advantage, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y100 if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for social media, browsing, and light gaming, and value a balanced feature set. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and a brighter, more vibrant display, and are willing to trade some software polish for raw power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, it can generate heat under sustained load. However, the 4nm process node and the Poco F5 Pro's cooling system are designed to mitigate throttling. Expect some warmth, but not necessarily performance-crippling overheating, even during demanding games. Monitoring temperatures with third-party apps is recommended.
❓ How does the Dimensity 900 in the vivo Y100 handle graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 900 can run PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. It won't deliver the same level of performance or graphical fidelity as the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro. Expect occasional frame drops during intense firefights.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Poco F5 Pro compatible with all USB-PD chargers?
The Poco F5 Pro supports USB Power Delivery (PD) 3.0, meaning it *should* work with most USB-PD chargers. However, to achieve the full 67W charging speed, you'll need a charger specifically rated for that wattage and PD 3.0 compatibility. Using a lower-wattage charger will still charge the phone, but at a slower rate.
