The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y100 and Samsung Galaxy A34 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which device deserves your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 takes the crown for overall value, boasting a brighter display, longer battery life, and a more established ecosystem. However, the vivo Y100 offers faster charging and a slightly more powerful chipset, making it a strong choice for performance-focused users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 16 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 16 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 7.7 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | IP54, dust and water resistant
Color changing back panel color | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 98.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | - | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 60% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Metal Black, Twilight Gold, Pacific Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | V2239 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | € 97.26 | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y100
- Faster Charging (44W)
- Slightly More Powerful Chipset
- Potentially Unique Camera Features
- Modern Design
- Lower Brightness Display
- Less Established Brand
- Potentially Less Refined Camera Software
- Shorter Battery Life
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Brighter Display (1009 nits)
- Exceptional Battery Life (133h Endurance)
- Trusted Brand Reputation
- Refined Camera Software
- Water and Dust Resistance (likely)
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Slightly Less Powerful Chipset
- Nominal Contrast Ratio Specification
- Can be pricier
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34 shines with its measured 1009 nits peak brightness, making it easily viewable outdoors. While the Y100's display is good, it lacks the same level of brightness. The A34's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors, though specifics are hard to quantify. Both use AMOLED panels, so expect rich colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but Samsung's image processing is generally considered more refined. The A34 likely delivers more consistent results across different lighting conditions. The Y100 may offer some unique camera features or modes, but the A34's overall camera experience is likely more polished.
Performance
The vivo Y100's Dimensity 900 chipset edges out the A34's Dimensity 1080 in raw processing power. While both feature octa-core CPUs with Cortex-A78 cores, the Y100's slightly higher clock speeds give it a small advantage in demanding tasks. However, real-world performance differences may be minimal for everyday use.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A34 is the clear winner in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 133 hours. The Y100's battery is decent, but doesn't match the A34's longevity. The A34's slower 25W charging is a drawback compared to the Y100's 44W fast charging, which can significantly reduce charging times.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y100 is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a bit more processing power for gaming or demanding apps. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is perfect for those seeking a reliable, long-lasting phone with a vibrant display and a trusted brand reputation.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo Y100 has a slightly more powerful chipset, which *could* translate to slightly better gaming performance, but the difference is likely minimal. Both phones are capable of handling most mobile games.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A34 waterproof?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 is likely to have an IP rating for water and dust resistance, a common feature in Samsung's A series. The vivo Y100's water resistance is less certain and should be verified in the official specifications.
