The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y100 and OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but which one truly comes out on top? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster 67W charging and the generally more efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset. While the vivo Y100 has a slightly more powerful CPU, the Nord CE 3 Lite's charging speed and overall value make it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 16 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 16 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 7.7 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | IP54, dust and water resistant
Color changing back panel color | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 98.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | - | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 60% in 30 min | 67W wired, 80% in 30 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Metal Black, Twilight Gold, Pacific Blue | Pastel Lime, Chromatic Gray |
| Models | V2239 | CPH2467, CPH2465 |
| Price | € 97.26 | £ 169.98 / € 209.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 412006 (v9)
GeekBench: 2052 (v5)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y100
- Slightly more powerful CPU
- Potentially better camera versatility
- Stylish design (typical of vivo)
- Slower charging speed
- May not offer the best value for money
- Software experience can be polarizing
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Generally smoother user experience
- Good value for money
- CPU slightly less powerful than Y100
- Design might be considered less premium
- Camera performance may not match the Y100 in all scenarios
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.79-inch display, likely with an LCD panel and a resolution around 1080 x 2400 pixels. While specific display technologies (like refresh rate) aren't explicitly stated, the Nord CE 3 Lite might offer a slightly better viewing experience due to potential calibration differences and OnePlus's generally strong display tuning. Expect vibrant colors and decent brightness on both.
Camera Comparison
The vivo Y100 is expected to have a versatile camera system, potentially including a 64MP main sensor, an ultrawide lens, and a macro lens. The Nord CE 3 Lite features a 108MP main camera, which should offer more detail in well-lit conditions. Image processing and software features will play a significant role in the final image quality, and both phones likely offer various modes and enhancements.
Performance
The vivo Y100's Dimensity 900 boasts a higher peak CPU performance with its Cortex-A78 cores. However, the Snapdragon 695 5G in the Nord CE 3 Lite is known for its efficiency and consistent performance in everyday tasks and light gaming. Real-world performance will likely be similar for most users, but the Nord CE 3 Lite might handle sustained loads slightly better due to better thermal management.
Battery Life
This is where the Nord CE 3 Lite shines. Its 67W charging is significantly faster than the vivo Y100's 44W. Both phones likely have a similar battery capacity (around 5000mAh), but the faster charging means the Nord CE 3 Lite will top up much quicker. This is a major advantage for users who frequently need to charge their phones.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y100 is ideal for users prioritizing a slightly more powerful processor for demanding tasks and those who appreciate vivo's design aesthetic. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite is perfect for those who value fast charging, a reliable chipset, and a generally smoother user experience, especially if budget is a primary concern.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
While both have similar battery capacities, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite's faster charging means it will recharge much quicker, effectively giving it better overall battery usability.
❓ Is the vivo Y100 worth the extra money?
It depends on your priorities. If you need the absolute fastest charging and value for money, the Nord CE 3 Lite is the better choice. If you prioritize a slightly more powerful processor and a specific design aesthetic, the Y100 might be worth considering.
