The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y100 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of features and affordability. While both devices utilize MediaTek Dimensity chipsets, they diverge in key areas like charging speed, battery endurance, and display brightness, making the choice less straightforward than it appears. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to help you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and rapid charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger contender. Its impressive 10:28h active use score and 68W charging significantly outperform the vivo Y100, despite the latter’s slightly more powerful CPU core clock speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 16 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 16 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 7.7 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| | IP54, dust and water resistant
Color changing back panel color | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.38 inches, 98.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | - | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 60% in 30 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Metal Black, Twilight Gold, Pacific Blue | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2239 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | € 97.26 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo Y100
- Potentially lower price point
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed
- MediaTek Dimensity 900 chipset
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Missing battery life data
- Likely lower peak display brightness
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Fast 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Slightly lower CPU clock speed
- Camera details are limited
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is a crucial advantage for users who frequently use their phones outdoors or in brightly lit environments. While the vivo Y100’s display specifications are not provided, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness level suggests superior visibility. The absence of LTPO technology in either device means refresh rate scaling isn’t as efficient as flagship models, but the brightness difference is a clear win for Motorola.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications beyond 'Photo / Video' are unavailable for the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. However, Motorola typically focuses on computational photography and image processing. The vivo Y100’s camera details are also missing. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. It’s safe to assume both phones will offer adequate camera performance for social media and casual photography, but enthusiasts will need to look at independent reviews for detailed image quality assessments.
Performance
Both the vivo Y100 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo are powered by 6nm MediaTek Dimensity chipsets. However, the Edge 40 Neo utilizes the Dimensity 7030, featuring a CPU with 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, while the Y100 has the Dimensity 900 with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This slight clock speed advantage in the Motorola translates to marginally faster single-core performance, but the real-world difference will likely be minimal for most users. The impact of RAM speed (LPDDR4x vs LPDDR5x, assumed for Edge 40 Neo) isn’t specified, but faster RAM would benefit multitasking and app loading times on the Motorola.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an endurance rating of 80 hours. This is a substantial advantage over the vivo Y100, for which battery life data is absent. Furthermore, the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging is significantly faster than the Y100’s 44W charging – achieving 50% charge in just 15 minutes compared to the Y100’s 30 minutes for 60%. This faster charging is a major convenience factor for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y100 if you prioritize raw CPU performance for demanding tasks and appreciate a potentially lower price point. This phone is ideal for users who frequently engage in CPU-intensive applications. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value long-lasting battery life, incredibly fast charging, and a brighter display for outdoor visibility. This is the better choice for everyday users and media consumers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Motorola Edge 40 Neo's Dimensity 7030 chipset get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7030 is a capable chipset, sustained gaming can generate heat. However, Motorola's thermal management solutions typically prevent significant throttling, allowing for reasonably consistent performance over extended periods. Independent reviews should provide specific thermal testing data.
❓ How does the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo compare to other fast charging standards?
68W charging is considerably faster than standard 25W or 33W charging, allowing you to replenish a significant portion of the battery in a short amount of time. While not the absolute fastest charging available (some phones now offer 120W+), it's a substantial improvement over the vivo Y100's 44W charging.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo a cause for concern?
It's understandable to be cautious without detailed camera specs. However, Motorola often prioritizes software optimization and computational photography to deliver good image quality, even with mid-range hardware. Look for independent camera reviews to assess real-world performance.
❓ What type of storage does the Motorola Edge 40 Neo use, and is it expandable?
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo utilizes UFS 3.1 storage, which is fast and efficient. However, it does *not* offer microSD card expansion, so you'll need to choose a storage configuration that meets your needs upfront.
