Xiaomi Redmi K70E vs. vivo Y100 (China): A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K70E is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset delivers a substantial performance leap over the Snapdragon 695 in the vivo Y100, coupled with significantly faster 90W charging. While the Y100 offers a lower entry price, the K70E’s benefits justify the cost for power users and gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y100 (China) | Xiaomi Redmi K70E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 27 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 27 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 183 g (6.07 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired Reverse wired | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC2, 100% in 34 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Green, Black | Black, White, Mint |
| Models | V2313A | 2311DRK48C |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 260 EUR |
vivo Y100 (China)
- More affordable price point
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly weaker processor performance
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Likely a less advanced camera system
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra processor
- Ultra-fast 90W wired charging
- Likely a superior camera system
- PD3.0 and QC2 charging support
- Higher price compared to the vivo Y100
- May require more frequent charging depending on usage
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the K70E's positioning, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel (potentially 120Hz or 144Hz) compared to the Y100. The K70E is also more likely to have a higher peak brightness, improving visibility in direct sunlight. The Y100, being a more budget-focused device, may utilize a simpler LCD panel, while the K70E will likely use AMOLED.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the K70E, being a higher-tier device, is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Y100 likely relies on a more basic camera setup, potentially prioritizing quantity of lenses over quality. Image processing capabilities will also likely favor the K70E, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Xiaomi Redmi K70E’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core and 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 cores, alongside 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 cores. This contrasts sharply with the vivo Y100’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm), which utilizes a more modest octa-core configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, translating to sustained performance during demanding tasks. Gamers and power users will find the K70E significantly more capable.
Battery Life
The Redmi K70E’s 90W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of charging the device from 0-100% in a claimed 34 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the vivo Y100’s 44W wired charging. While battery capacity isn't specified for either device, the K70E’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The K70E also supports PD3.0 and QC2 charging standards, offering broader compatibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y100 (China) if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. You'll appreciate its reverse wired charging for topping up accessories. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70E if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and fast charging, and are willing to spend a bit more for a significantly smoother and more responsive experience.