The Xiaomi Civi 3 and vivo Y100 (China) represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Civi 3 aggressively targets performance with a flagship-adjacent chipset, while the Y100 prioritizes efficiency and a balanced feature set. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Civi 3 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8200 Ultra offers a substantial leap in processing power. However, the vivo Y100 provides a more efficient experience with its Snapdragon 695, potentially leading to better battery life for everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 27 | 2023, May 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 27 | Available. Released 2023, May 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 158.7 x 71.7 x 7.6 mm (6.25 x 2.82 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 183 g (6.07 oz) | 174 g (6.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Quad-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF
32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Features | - | 2 Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 38 minutes |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Green, Black | Purple, Mint, Gold, Gray |
| Models | V2313A | 23046PNC9C |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 330 EUR |
vivo Y100 (China)
- More power-efficient chipset (Snapdragon 695)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially longer battery life for basic usage
- Significantly lower processing power
- Likely less capable camera system
- Slower charging speeds
Xiaomi Civi 3
- Much faster processor (Dimensity 8200 Ultra)
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0
- Likely superior display quality
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May run warmer during intensive tasks
- Higher price point (likely)
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Civi 3's positioning, it likely features an AMOLED panel with a higher refresh rate than the Y100. The Y100, being a more budget-focused device, may utilize an LCD panel. Color accuracy and peak brightness will likely favor the Civi 3, assuming it employs a more advanced display technology. Bezels are also likely to be slimmer on the Civi 3, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, analysis is limited. However, the Civi 3, positioned as a more premium device, likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Y100 will likely rely on software optimization to compensate for a potentially smaller sensor. Lens apertures are also crucial; a wider aperture (lower f-number) on the Civi 3 would allow for better low-light performance. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Civi 3, which is common in this price range, would further enhance image quality and video stabilization.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Xiaomi Civi 3’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring a 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 core and 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, alongside 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts sharply with the vivo Y100’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), which utilizes a more modest octa-core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver). The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8200 Ultra offers superior power efficiency *at peak performance* compared to the 6nm Snapdragon 695. While the Snapdragon 695 is efficient for basic tasks, the Dimensity 8200 Ultra will deliver a far smoother experience in graphically intensive games and multitasking. The Civi 3 will likely handle demanding applications and future software updates with greater ease.
Battery Life
The vivo Y100 offers 44W wired charging, while the Xiaomi Civi 3 boasts a faster 67W wired charging solution with PD3.0 support, achieving a full charge in just 38 minutes. While battery capacity isn't specified, the Snapdragon 695's efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery in the Y100, providing comparable real-world battery life. However, the Civi 3’s faster charging is a significant convenience factor, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y100 (China) if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and don't demand the absolute highest performance. It's ideal for social media, light gaming, and everyday communication. Buy the Xiaomi Civi 3 if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and fast charging, and are willing to trade some potential battery life for a significantly more powerful processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 8200 Ultra in the Civi 3 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 8200 Ultra is powerful, Mediatek has made strides in thermal management. However, sustained peak performance *can* lead to throttling. The Civi 3's cooling solution will be a key factor; look for reviews that specifically test gaming thermals. The Snapdragon 695 in the Y100 is less prone to overheating due to its lower power draw.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the vivo Y100 slow compared to the Civi 3's 67W?
44W is adequate for topping up overnight, but 67W on the Civi 3 is considerably faster. The Civi 3 can reach 100% in approximately 38 minutes, while the Y100 will take significantly longer. This difference is most noticeable for users who frequently need a quick charge.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 695 handle multitasking compared to the Dimensity 8200 Ultra?
The Dimensity 8200 Ultra's superior CPU and RAM bandwidth will result in a much smoother multitasking experience. The Snapdragon 695 can handle moderate multitasking, but the Civi 3 will be able to keep more apps active in the background without performance degradation.
