The OnePlus Ace 3V and vivo Y100 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Ace 3V aims for near-flagship performance with the latest Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, while the Y100 focuses on delivering a solid 5G experience at a more accessible price point with the Snapdragon 695. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Ace 3V is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset delivers significantly faster performance and improved efficiency, complemented by blazing-fast 100W charging. While the vivo Y100 offers a more budget-friendly entry point, the performance gap is substantial.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 27 | 2024, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 27 | Available. Released 2024, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.9 x 7.6 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 162.7 x 75.2 x 8.5 mm (6.41 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 183 g (6.07 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1100 nits (HBM), 2150 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7675 Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 732 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Green, Black | Purple, Gray |
| Models | V2313A | PJF110 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 260 EUR |
vivo Y100 (China)
- More affordable price point
- Reliable 5G connectivity
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Significantly slower performance
- Slower charging speeds
- Likely lower quality display
OnePlus Ace 3V
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Likely higher quality AMOLED display
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat under sustained load (though the 4nm process helps)
- May not be available in all markets
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the Y100's positioning, it likely features a 6.67-inch LCD panel with a standard 60Hz refresh rate. The Ace 3V, targeting a more performance-oriented user, likely boasts a 6.78-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate. The move to AMOLED on the Ace 3V would provide superior contrast, color accuracy, and viewing angles. The 120Hz refresh rate would translate to smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the overall user experience. The Ace 3V is likely to have smaller bezels, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, analysis is limited. However, the Ace 3V, positioned as a more premium device, likely features a more capable main sensor with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 also includes a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP), enabling better image processing and low-light performance. While the Y100 may offer a decent camera for casual photography, the Ace 3V is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging conditions. We can expect the Ace 3V to have a larger sensor size, allowing for more light capture and detail.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 3V’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4nm) is a generational leap ahead of the vivo Y100’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm). The 7+ Gen 3 features a prime Cortex-X4 core clocked at 2.8GHz, offering significantly higher peak performance compared to the Y100’s Kryo 660 Gold cores at 2.2GHz. The 4nm process node of the 7+ Gen 3 also translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This means the Ace 3V will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease and maintain consistent performance for longer periods. The Y100 is suitable for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games or heavy multitasking.
Battery Life
The vivo Y100 offers 44W wired charging, while the OnePlus Ace 3V boasts a significantly faster 100W wired charging solution, capable of fully charging the device in just 26 minutes. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the Ace 3V mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The 6nm vs 4nm process also means the Ace 3V will be more efficient, potentially extending battery life despite the higher performance demands. The Y100's 44W charging, while adequate, will take considerably longer to replenish the battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y100 (China) if you prioritize affordability and a reliable 5G connection for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption. Buy the OnePlus Ace 3V if you demand smoother multitasking, a more responsive gaming experience, and significantly faster charging speeds, even if it means a higher upfront investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the vivo Y100 struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is not designed for high-end gaming. While you might be able to run Genshin Impact at the lowest settings, expect significant frame drops and a less-than-ideal experience. The OnePlus Ace 3V’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 is far better suited for demanding titles.
❓ How much faster is the 100W charging on the OnePlus Ace 3V compared to the 44W charging on the vivo Y100 in real-world use?
The 100W charging on the Ace 3V is dramatically faster. OnePlus claims a full charge in 26 minutes, while the Y100 will likely take over an hour to reach 100%. This means you can quickly top up the Ace 3V during short breaks, providing significantly more convenience.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
While both phones will handle everyday tasks adequately, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 in the Ace 3V provides a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience. App launch times will be faster, multitasking will be more fluid, and scrolling will be less laggy.
