vivo Y100 4G vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a vibrant display, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, and the measured 10:28h active use score significantly surpasses what the Y100 4G is likely to achieve. While the Y100 4G’s 80W charging is impressive, it doesn’t fully compensate for the Edge 40 Neo’s overall refinement.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y100 4G | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 03 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 03 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g or 196 g (6.56 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 80% in 30 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Crystal Black, Breeze Green | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2412 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo Y100 4G
- Extremely fast 80W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less powerful Snapdragon 685 chipset
- Likely inferior display brightness
- Unknown battery capacity and endurance
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Superior battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- More powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Slightly slower 68W charging
- Potentially higher price
- May lack reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a common pain point for smartphone users. While the vivo Y100 4G’s display specifications are not provided, it’s unlikely to match this level of brightness. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely benefits from its higher price point, potentially incorporating features like HDR10+ support for richer colors and contrast. The lack of display details for the Y100 4G suggests a more basic panel focused on cost reduction.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo Y100 4G, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on many budget phones suggests limited utility. The Edge 40 Neo’s camera system is likely tuned for a more natural and balanced look, while the Y100 4G may lean towards more saturated colors, a common trend in vivo’s image processing.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, represents a clear step up in CPU performance compared to the vivo Y100 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685. The Snapdragon 685 utilizes older Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.8 GHz, which, despite the higher clock speed, are less efficient and offer lower IPC (Instructions Per Clock) than the A78 cores. Both chips are fabricated on a 6nm process, but the architectural advantages of the Dimensity 7030 translate to smoother app launches, faster multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. The Edge 40 Neo is better equipped for demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s endurance rating of 80 hours and active use score of 10:28h demonstrates a significant advantage in battery life. While the vivo Y100 4G’s battery capacity is unknown, its 80W charging capability is its primary battery-related strength. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging still delivers a respectable 50% charge in 15 minutes, but the Y100 4G aims for 80% in 30 minutes. However, faster charging is less valuable if the battery drains quickly. The Edge 40 Neo’s larger battery and more efficient chipset provide a more sustainable power solution.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y100 4G if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and frequently find yourself needing to top up your phone quickly. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a more balanced experience with longer battery life, a brighter and more usable display in sunlight, and a slightly more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming.