The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y04 and Xiaomi Redmi 10A are two contenders vying for your attention. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dives deep into their core specifications to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-lasting battery life and a slightly more capable processor, the vivo Y04 emerges as the winner. Its Unisoc T7225 chipset and impressive 52:40h endurance rating provide a noticeable advantage over the Redmi 10A's Helio G25 and 10W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 26 | 2022, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 11 | Available. Released 2022, March 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 77 x 8.2 mm (6.59 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 9 mm (6.49 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 570 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7225 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Gold (Titanium Silver), Dark Green (Majestic Green), Violet | Charcoal Black, Sea Blue, Slate Grey |
| Models | V2430 | 220233L2C, 220233L2G, 220233L2I |
| Price | About 110 EUR | € 60.00 / $ 66.55 |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) | 0.90 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.40 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 52:40h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (300 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
vivo Y04
- Superior CPU architecture for smoother performance
- Exceptional battery life (52:40h endurance)
- Faster 15W charging
- Detailed display specs are unknown
- Camera performance likely basic
Xiaomi Redmi 10A
- Potentially lower price point
- Familiar MIUI software (depending on region)
- Widely available
- Inferior CPU performance
- Significantly shorter battery life
- Slow 10W charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. Detailed display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing, but the focus here is on internal components. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, impacting the overall screen-to-body ratio. Color accuracy is likely to be standard for the segment, prioritizing power efficiency over color fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse, but it's safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups. Focusing on the main sensors, the Y04 likely has a similar or slightly better sensor than the Redmi 10A, but without specific megapixel counts or aperture information, it's difficult to definitively say. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on the Redmi 10A is largely inconsequential; its image quality will be limited. Image processing will likely be basic on both, prioritizing speed over advanced features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y04’s Unisoc T7225, built on a 12nm process, features a more modern CPU architecture with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Redmi 10A’s MediaTek Helio G25, which uses 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The A75 cores in the Y04 represent a significant architectural improvement over the A53 cores in the Redmi 10A, translating to better single-core performance and responsiveness. While both are 12nm, the architectural advantage favors the Y04 for smoother multitasking and app loading. The Redmi 10A will likely struggle more with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The vivo Y04 truly shines in battery endurance, boasting a remarkable 52:40h rating. This is significantly better than what we'd expect from a phone with a similar capacity battery, suggesting excellent power efficiency from the Unisoc T7225 chipset. The Redmi 10A, with its 10W charging, will take considerably longer to fully charge. The Y04’s 15W charging, while not fast by modern standards, offers a noticeable improvement in recharge times, making it more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y04 if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day – and then some – of moderate use, and if you occasionally engage in tasks beyond basic social media and messaging. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10A if you prioritize a slightly lower upfront cost and are content with a more basic smartphone experience, understanding that battery life and performance will be more limited.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T7225 in the vivo Y04 handle popular apps like WhatsApp, Facebook, and YouTube smoothly?
Yes, the Unisoc T7225's Cortex-A75 cores provide a noticeable performance boost over the Helio G25, ensuring a smooth experience with everyday apps like WhatsApp, Facebook, and YouTube. While it won't excel at demanding games, it will handle these core applications without significant lag.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the vivo Y04 with the 15W charger compared to the Redmi 10A?
The vivo Y04's 15W charging will significantly reduce charging times compared to the Redmi 10A's 10W charging. While exact times depend on battery level, expect the Y04 to reach 100% in approximately 2.5-3 hours, while the Redmi 10A could take upwards of 4 hours.
❓ Is the battery life of the vivo Y04 sufficient for a full day of heavy use (e.g., constant social media, video streaming)?
The vivo Y04's 52:40h endurance rating suggests it can comfortably handle a full day of heavy use. Even with constant social media and video streaming, you should have battery life remaining at the end of the day, making it ideal for users who are frequently on the go.
