The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y03t and Realme C67 4G both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches. The Y03t relies on the Unisoc T612, while the C67 4G opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 685. This comparison dissects these choices, revealing which phone offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme C67 4G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 685, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and better thermal management compared to the vivo Y03t’s Unisoc T612. The 33W charging is a significant benefit, offsetting the slightly smaller battery capacity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 19 | 2023, December 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 19 | Available. Released 2023, December 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.6 x 8.4 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.6 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.48 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~87.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 528 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 800 nits (typ), 950 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T612 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Black, Gem Green | Sunny Oasis, Black Rock |
| Models | - | RMX3890 |
| Price | About 70 EUR | About 160 EUR |
vivo Y03t
- Potentially longer battery life with light usage
- May be more affordable depending on region
- Reliable for basic smartphone tasks
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 685
- Slower 15W charging
- Likely to exhibit more thermal throttling under load
Realme C67 4G
- More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 685 chipset
- Significantly faster 33W charging
- Better multitasking and app responsiveness
- May have slightly shorter battery life under heavy load
- Potentially higher price point
- Software experience can be bloated with Realme UI
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. However, detailed specs are missing. The Realme C67 4G, given Realme’s recent trends, may have a slightly higher peak brightness. The real difference will likely be in color calibration and viewing angles, areas where Realme often demonstrates a slight edge. Without specific nit ratings, it's difficult to declare a clear winner.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a primary camera paired with depth or macro sensors. However, the Snapdragon 685’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally more capable than the Unisoc T612’s, resulting in better image processing, dynamic range, and low-light performance on the Realme C67 4G. The 2MP macro cameras found on many phones in this segment are unlikely to deliver significant detail on either device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme C67 4G’s Snapdragon 685 (6nm) is a clear upgrade over the vivo Y03t’s Unisoc T612 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially sustained performance during prolonged use. While the Y03t’s Cortex-A75 cores offer a clock speed advantage (1.8GHz vs 2.8GHz on the C67’s A73 cores), the Snapdragon 685’s architecture and process node provide a more substantial overall performance boost, particularly in GPU-intensive tasks. The C67 4G will handle multitasking and moderately demanding apps with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Realme C67 4G’s 33W charging is a game-changer in this price segment. This will significantly reduce charging times compared to the vivo Y03t’s 15W charging. While the Y03t may have a slightly larger battery capacity (spec not provided), the Snapdragon 685’s efficiency means the C67 4G will likely offer comparable, if not better, real-world battery life, especially with moderate to heavy usage. The faster charging speed provides a crucial convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y03t if your primary need is a basic, reliable smartphone for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and you prioritize a potentially longer-lasting battery due to the less powerful chipset. Buy the Realme C67 4G if you value smoother multitasking, a more responsive user experience, and significantly faster charging speeds, even if it means slightly less battery life in demanding scenarios.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme C67 4G struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Snapdragon 685 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it's capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense action, but it's a playable experience. The Unisoc T612 in the vivo Y03t will likely struggle more with consistent performance in demanding titles.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Realme C67 4G from 0%?
With 33W charging, the Realme C67 4G should fully charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 60-75 minutes, depending on usage during charging. This is a substantial improvement over the vivo Y03t’s 15W charging, which will likely take over 2 hours.
❓ Is the Unisoc T612 in the vivo Y03t sufficient for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the Unisoc T612 is perfectly adequate for basic tasks like web browsing, social media, and messaging. However, you may experience noticeable slowdowns when multitasking or running multiple apps simultaneously. It's best suited for users with light smartphone usage.
❓ Does the Realme C67 4G support VoLTE and VoWiFi?
Generally, Realme phones in this segment support VoLTE (Voice over LTE) and VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) for improved call quality and connectivity. However, compatibility depends on your carrier and region. It's best to check with your mobile provider to confirm support.
