The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, demanding a careful balance of features and performance. Both the vivo Y03t and the Infinix Smart 8 Pro aim to deliver just that, but they take different approaches. The Y03t leverages the Unisoc T612, while the Smart 8 Pro opts for the MediaTek Helio G36. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device offers the best value for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y03t emerges as the slightly better choice. Its Unisoc T612 chipset, featuring Cortex-A75 cores, provides a noticeable performance edge over the Infinix Smart 8 Pro’s Helio G36, particularly in multi-tasking and demanding applications. While the Smart 8 Pro offers reverse wired charging, the Y03t’s superior processing power makes it the more capable all-rounder.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 19 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 19 | Available. Released 2024, February |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.6 x 8.4 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 163.6 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 528 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T612 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13 (Go edition), XOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Ring-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 10W wired
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Black, Gem Green | Rainbow Blue, Galaxy White, Shiny Gold, Timber Black |
| Models | - | X6525B |
| Price | About 70 EUR | About 100 EUR |
vivo Y03t
- More powerful chipset (Unisoc T612 with Cortex-A75 cores)
- Faster 15W wired charging
- Potentially better image processing due to ISP
- Lacks reverse wired charging
- Display specs are unknown and likely basic
Infinix Smart 8 Pro
- Reverse wired charging for accessory top-ups
- Competitive price point
- Simple and user-friendly interface
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G36 with Cortex-A53 cores)
- Slower 10W wired charging
- Potentially lower performance in demanding apps
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both utilize 12nm chipsets, suggesting similar power constraints impacting display capabilities. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are absent, the focus here is on processing power, not visual fidelity. Expect basic LCD panels suitable for everyday use, but not ideal for outdoor visibility or media consumption. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, consistent with their price point.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both phones targeting the entry-level segment. Without detailed sensor information, it’s safe to assume both feature a primary camera and potentially a depth or macro sensor. The image processing capabilities will likely be basic, prioritizing speed over detail. The absence of OIS on either device suggests image stabilization will rely heavily on software algorithms. Focusing on the chipset, the Y03t’s slightly more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the T612 could offer marginally better image processing, but the difference will be minimal.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y03t’s Unisoc T612 features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture provides a significant advantage in sustained performance compared to the Infinix Smart 8 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G36, which utilizes four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.2 GHz and four more at 1.6 GHz. While the G36’s higher clock speed on the A53 cores might offer a slight boost in single-core tasks, the A75 cores in the T612 excel in multi-threaded workloads and offer better overall responsiveness. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the Y03t. The absence of LPDDR5x RAM information suggests both likely use LPDDR4X, further emphasizing the chipset as the primary performance differentiator.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but both phones likely feature batteries in the 5000mAh range, typical for this price bracket. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The vivo Y03t supports 15W wired charging, while the Infinix Smart 8 Pro is limited to 10W. This means the Y03t will charge noticeably faster, reducing downtime. The Smart 8 Pro’s inclusion of reverse wired charging is a unique feature, allowing it to act as a power bank for other devices, but this convenience comes at the cost of slower overall charging speeds.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y03t if you prioritize smoother application performance and a more responsive user experience, even if it means sacrificing reverse wireless charging. This phone is ideal for users who frequently switch between apps or enjoy light gaming. Buy the Infinix Smart 8 Pro if you value the convenience of reverse wired charging – allowing you to top up accessories – and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and social media. It’s a solid option for first-time smartphone users or those on a very tight budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Infinix Smart 8 Pro struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the Infinix Smart 8 Pro can handle basic apps like WhatsApp and Facebook, the Helio G36 chipset may exhibit noticeable lag when multitasking or running these apps alongside other background processes. The vivo Y03t, with its more powerful Unisoc T612, will provide a smoother and more responsive experience in these scenarios.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the vivo Y03t with the 15W charger?
Assuming a 5000mAh battery (typical for this segment), the vivo Y03t should fully charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 2.5 to 3 hours with the included 15W charger. This is significantly faster than the Infinix Smart 8 Pro’s estimated 4-5 hours with its 10W charger.
❓ Is the reverse wired charging on the Infinix Smart 8 Pro useful for more than just earbuds?
The reverse wired charging on the Infinix Smart 8 Pro can be used to charge other devices like smartwatches, portable speakers, or even another smartphone, albeit at a very slow rate. However, its output is limited, making it best suited for smaller accessories rather than fully charging another phone.
