The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the vivo Y03t and Honor X6a aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an incredibly accessible price point. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money, focusing on performance, charging speed, and overall usability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing quick top-ups and slightly better performance, the Honor X6a is the stronger choice. Its 22.5W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the vivo Y03t’s 15W charging, and the Helio G36 offers a modest CPU performance advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 19 | 2023, July 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 19 | Available. Released 2023, July 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.6 x 8.4 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 163.3 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 528 nits (HBM) | TFT LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T612 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MagicOS 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 22.5W wired, 31% in 20 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Black, Gem Green | Cyan Lake, Midnight Black |
| Models | - | WDY-LX1, WDY-LX2 |
| Price | About 70 EUR | About 150 EUR |
vivo Y03t
- Potentially more efficient CPU architecture with Cortex-A75 cores
- Reliable brand reputation for basic functionality
- Likely competitive pricing
- Slower 15W charging
- Potentially lower CPU performance in sustained tasks
- Limited gaming capabilities
Honor X6a
- Faster 22.5W charging with 31% in 20 minutes
- Slightly higher CPU clock speeds
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Cortex-A53 cores are less efficient than A75 cores
- May have more aggressive software bloat
- Camera performance likely similar to vivo Y03t
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both utilize 12nm chipsets, suggesting similar power constraints impacting display capabilities. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, the focus here is on performance. Expect basic LCD panels suitable for everyday viewing, but not ideal for HDR content or outdoor use. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, given the price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, relying heavily on software processing. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make definitive claims. However, budget phones in this segment often prioritize megapixel count over sensor size and quality. Expect acceptable results in good lighting conditions, but struggles in low light. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset. The Honor X6a’s MediaTek Helio G36 features four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, while the vivo Y03t utilizes the Unisoc T612 with two Cortex-A75 cores at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also at 1.8 GHz. While the Unisoc T612’s A75 cores offer higher individual performance, the Helio G36’s higher clock speed on its A53 cores and potentially more efficient architecture may translate to a smoother experience in sustained tasks. The Helio G36 is generally considered to offer a slight edge in gaming performance, though neither phone is a gaming powerhouse. Both likely feature similar RAM configurations, further minimizing the performance gap.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature batteries in the 5000mAh range, typical for this price point. However, the Honor X6a’s 22.5W charging is a significant advantage. Honor claims a 31% charge in 20 minutes, translating to roughly a 10% gain per 6.5 minutes. The vivo Y03t’s 15W charging will take considerably longer to reach a full charge, potentially over two hours. This difference in charging speed is a key differentiator for users who value convenience and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y03t if you prioritize a simple, reliable experience and are less concerned with fast charging or demanding applications. It’s a solid option for basic communication and light social media use. Buy the Honor X6a if you need faster charging to minimize downtime and want a slightly more responsive experience for everyday tasks and casual gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Helio G36 in the Honor X6a capable of running PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Helio G36 can run PUBG Mobile, but expect to play on low to medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. It's not a dedicated gaming chip, so demanding graphics settings will likely result in lag and stuttering. The vivo Y03t will likely offer a similar, if not slightly less smooth, experience.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the vivo Y03t with the included 15W charger?
Given the 15W charging rate and a likely 5000mAh battery, a full charge from 0% to 100% on the vivo Y03t will likely take over two hours. This is significantly slower than the Honor X6a’s 22.5W charging.
❓ Does the Honor X6a have any bloatware pre-installed?
Honor phones have historically included some pre-installed apps, often referred to as bloatware. While the extent of bloatware varies, users should expect to find some third-party applications pre-installed on the Honor X6a. These can often be uninstalled or disabled.
❓ Which phone is better for watching videos on YouTube?
Both phones will be adequate for watching YouTube videos, but neither offers a particularly impressive display. The viewing experience will be limited by the likely LCD panel and resolution. The Honor X6a's slightly faster processor might offer marginally smoother playback of higher-resolution videos.
