The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the vivo Y02s and the Motorola Moto E32 (India variant) aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price. While appearing similar on the surface, a closer look reveals a subtle but important difference in their core processing power, stemming from the Mediatek Helio P35 in the vivo and the Helio G37 in the Motorola.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing slightly smoother performance in everyday tasks and potentially better gaming, the Motorola Moto E32 (India) is the better choice. The Helio G37 offers a modest clock speed bump and is generally more efficient, despite both phones sharing the same 10W charging and similar overall specifications.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 01 | 2022, October 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 22 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76 x 8.2 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0, 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0; OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Vibrant Blue, Fluorite Black | Iceberg Blue, Cosmic Black |
| Models | V2203 | - |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 130 EUR |
vivo Y02s
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Established brand recognition (vivo)
- Reliable basic functionality
- Less powerful chipset (Helio P35)
- Limited gaming performance
- Slow charging (10W)
Motorola Moto E32 (India)
- Slightly better performance (Helio G37)
- Potentially better gaming experience
- More efficient chipset
- Slow charging (10W)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Motorola's software update track record can be inconsistent
Display Comparison
Neither vivo nor Motorola provide detailed display specifications beyond the basic panel type. Given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of information regarding peak brightness, color gamut coverage, or refresh rates suggests a focus on cost reduction. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, and color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment. The user experience will be similar on both phones in terms of visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse for both devices. It's safe to assume both feature a primary camera and potentially a depth sensor. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing algorithms, a direct comparison is difficult. The marketing materials for both phones tend to emphasize megapixel count over image quality, suggesting a focus on appealing to casual users. Expect similar results in good lighting conditions, but both will struggle in low-light scenarios. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device means image stabilization will rely solely on software processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto E32 (India) features the Mediatek Helio G37, while the vivo Y02s uses the Helio P35. Both are 12nm chips with an octa-core configuration (4x2.35/2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53). The G37’s slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (2.3 GHz vs 2.35 GHz) and optimized architecture translate to a small performance advantage in benchmarks and real-world usage. While the difference isn't massive, the G37 is designed for slightly more demanding tasks. Both phones will likely struggle with graphically intensive games at higher settings, but the G37 will offer a marginally smoother experience. RAM configurations are not specified, but are likely to be similar, further minimizing the performance gap.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y02s and Motorola Moto E32 (India) are equipped with 10W wired charging. This is a significant limitation in 2024, translating to a lengthy charge time (likely exceeding 2.5 hours for a full 0-100% charge). Battery capacity is not specified, but given the target market, it's likely around 5000mAh on both devices. The slightly more efficient Helio G37 in the Moto E32 may result in marginally better battery life, but the difference will likely be minimal and dependent on usage patterns.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y02s if you need a reliably basic smartphone for calls, messaging, and light social media use, and are prioritizing brand familiarity. Buy the Motorola Moto E32 (India) if you prefer a device capable of handling slightly more demanding apps and occasional gaming sessions, benefiting from the marginally improved processing power of the Helio G37.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto E32 (India) handle PUBG Mobile smoothly?
While the Helio G37 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, expect to play at low to medium settings with a moderate frame rate. It's not a gaming-focused chipset, so demanding graphics will likely cause stuttering. The vivo Y02s with the Helio P35 will struggle even more.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge either phone from 0%?
With only 10W charging, expect a full charge to take over 2.5 hours, potentially closer to 3 hours. Neither phone offers fast charging capabilities, so patience is required.
❓ Is the difference between the Helio P35 and G37 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
The difference is subtle but present. The G37 in the Moto E32 will offer slightly faster app loading times and smoother scrolling, but the P35 in the Y02s is still adequate for basic tasks. Users accustomed to more powerful phones will notice the difference more.
❓ What about software updates? Which phone is likely to receive more frequent updates?
Motorola's software update track record is historically less consistent than vivo's. While Motorola has improved, vivo generally provides more timely security patches and Android version updates for its budget devices. However, both phones are likely to receive limited long-term support.
