The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the vivo Y02A and the Infinix Smart 6 Plus (India) aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an incredibly accessible price point. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device offers the best balance of performance and features for the budget-conscious user.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y02A emerges as the slightly better choice. While both phones share a similar target audience, the Helio P35’s marginally higher clock speeds and established optimization give it a small edge in everyday responsiveness. However, the Infinix Smart 6 Plus remains a viable option for those prioritizing a potentially lower price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 03 | 2022, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 03 | Available. Released 2022, August 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 172.6 x 77.7 x 8.7 mm (6.80 x 3.06 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~257 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 440 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition), Funtouch 12 | Android 12 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | Yes | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired
5W reverse wired | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Grey, Orchid Blue | Tranquil Sea Blue, Miracle Black |
| Models | V2234_PK | X6823C, X6823 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 100 EUR |
vivo Y02A
- Slightly faster CPU performance due to Helio P35
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Established Mediatek chipset optimization
- Slower 10W charging
- Likely higher price compared to Infinix
Infinix Smart 6 Plus (India)
- Potentially lower price point
- Helio G25 may offer slightly better battery efficiency
- Large battery capacity (likely 5000mAh)
- Slower CPU performance compared to Helio P35
- Unspecified charging speed (likely similar to vivo)
- Less established chipset optimization
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Detailed display specs (resolution, brightness) are unavailable, but we can infer similar performance. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but on basic readability. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor. Color accuracy will likely be standard for budget phones, prioritizing power efficiency over color calibration.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is expected to be basic on both devices. Detailed sensor information is missing, but both will likely feature a primary camera alongside depth or macro sensors of limited utility. The emphasis isn't on image quality, but on providing functional camera capabilities for casual snapshots. Image processing will be minimal, relying heavily on software algorithms to enhance photos. Expect struggles in low-light conditions and limited dynamic range. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device further limits low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo Y02A features the Mediatek Helio P35, while the Infinix Smart 6 Plus uses the Helio G25. The P35’s octa-core configuration runs at 4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, compared to the G25’s 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53. This translates to a slight advantage for the P35 in CPU-intensive tasks. While both use the same Cortex-A53 architecture, the higher clock speeds of the P35 will result in faster processing. The G25’s focus is on efficiency, potentially offering slightly better battery life, but at the cost of raw performance. Both are paired with limited RAM (specs not provided, but likely 2-3GB), which will impact multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature batteries in the 5000mAh range, common for this segment. However, charging speeds differ significantly: the vivo Y02A supports 10W wired charging, with 5W reverse wired charging, while the Infinix Smart 6 Plus’s charging speed is unspecified but likely similar. The 10W charging on the Y02A will result in a longer 0-100% charge time, but the reverse wired charging is a unique feature, allowing it to act as a power bank for other devices, albeit at a slow rate. The G25’s efficiency might slightly offset the slower charging, providing marginally longer overall usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y02A if you need a reliably responsive experience for basic tasks like calling, messaging, and light social media use. Its slightly more powerful chipset translates to smoother multitasking. Buy the Infinix Smart 6 Plus (India) if you prioritize finding the absolute lowest price and are willing to accept a potentially less fluid user experience, particularly when switching between apps or loading heavier websites.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G25 struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the Helio G25 can handle basic apps like WhatsApp and Facebook, expect some lag when multitasking or loading heavier content. The chipset is designed for efficiency, not peak performance, so demanding apps may experience slowdowns. The vivo Y02A’s Helio P35 will offer a smoother experience in these scenarios.
❓ Is the 5W reverse charging on the vivo Y02A actually useful?
The 5W reverse charging is a niche feature. It's incredibly slow and best suited for emergency situations where you need to provide a small amount of power to another device, like a Bluetooth earbud or smartwatch. Don't expect to fully charge another phone with it.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic mobile gaming?
Both phones can handle very basic 2D games. However, demanding 3D games will likely be unplayable or require extremely low graphics settings. The Helio P35 in the vivo Y02A will offer a slightly better gaming experience, but don't expect flagship-level performance.
