Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The vivo Y02 and Samsung Galaxy A04e are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A04e edges out the vivo Y02 thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and potentially better software support. While both are budget options, the A04e offers a marginally smoother experience and the Samsung brand reputation adds value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 29 | 2022, October 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 29 | Available. Released 2022, November 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition), Funtouch 12 | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired
5W reverse wired | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Grey, Orchid Blue | Black, Copper, Light Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A042F, SM-A042F/DS, SM-A042M, SM-A042M/DS |
| Price | About 90 EUR | ₹ 7,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.29 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y02
- Very affordable
- Decent battery life
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower chipset
- Basic camera
- Slower charging speed
Samsung Galaxy A04e
- Slightly better performance
- Samsung brand reputation
- Reverse wired charging
- Potentially better software support
- Still a budget phone
- Basic camera
- HD+ display
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch display, likely with an HD+ resolution. Expect decent viewing angles but don't anticipate vibrant colors or high brightness. The Samsung might have slightly better color calibration due to Samsung's display technology, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are generally similar, likely featuring a 13MP main camera and a 2MP depth sensor. Image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. Samsung's image processing might offer slightly more natural-looking results.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A04e's Helio P35 chipset offers a slight performance advantage over the vivo Y02's Helio P22. The P35's slightly higher clock speeds and different core configuration should translate to smoother app loading and multitasking. However, neither phone is a powerhouse.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life with moderate usage. The vivo Y02's 10W charging is slower than the A04e's 10W wired and 5W reverse wired charging, which offers a small advantage for the Samsung.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y02 is ideal for users prioritizing a very basic smartphone experience, primarily for calls, texts, and light social media use. The Samsung Galaxy A04e is a better choice for those needing a bit more performance for multitasking and occasional gaming, and who value the Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A04e has a slightly more powerful chipset (Helio P35 vs Helio P22), resulting in marginally better performance for multitasking and apps.
❓ Can either phone handle gaming?
Both phones are primarily for basic tasks. Light gaming is possible, but don't expect smooth performance in demanding titles. The A04e will handle it slightly better.
