Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The vivo Y02 and Samsung Galaxy A04 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A04 edges out the vivo Y02 thanks to its slightly more powerful processor and potentially better software support. While both are budget options, the A04 offers a marginally smoother experience and a more recognizable brand reputation.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 29 | 2022, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 29 | Available. Released 2022, October 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.4 x 76.3 x 9.1 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition), Funtouch 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/5", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired
5W reverse wired | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Grey, Orchid Blue | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | - | SM-A045F, SM-A045F/DS, SM-A045M |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 70 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.32 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y02
- Reverse wired charging
- Compact design
- Decent battery life
- Slower charging
- Less powerful processor
- Basic camera
Samsung Galaxy A04
- Slightly better performance
- Samsung brand reputation
- Potentially better software support
- No reverse wired charging
- Basic camera
- Plastic build
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar display technology (likely LCD) and resolution, around 6.5 inches. Expect adequate viewing angles and brightness for everyday use, but don't expect vibrant colors or high contrast. The A04 might have a slightly better panel based on Samsung's typical quality control, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are generally similar, likely featuring a primary 13MP camera on both devices. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Samsung often has slightly better image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in slightly better photos in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance will be subpar on both.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A04's Helio P35 chipset holds a slight advantage over the Y02's Helio P22. The P35's slightly higher clock speeds and different core configuration should translate to a bit snappier performance in everyday tasks and light gaming. However, both phones will struggle with demanding games.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature a 5000mAh battery, offering all-day battery life for moderate users. The vivo Y02's 10W charging is slower than the A04's 15W charging (estimated, as official A04 charging speeds vary by region). The reverse wired charging on the Y02 is a nice bonus for emergency power sharing.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y02 is ideal for users prioritizing a very basic smartphone experience, primarily for calls, texts, and light social media use. The Samsung Galaxy A04 is a better choice for those wanting a bit more performance for multitasking and occasional gaming, and who value the Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones have a 5000mAh battery and should offer all-day battery life. However, the A04 charges faster.
❓ Can I play demanding games on either of these phones?
No, neither phone is suitable for demanding games. They are best suited for light gaming and basic apps.
❓ Which phone will receive longer software updates?
Samsung generally provides longer software support for its devices, so the Galaxy A04 is likely to receive updates for a longer period.
