The vivo Xplay5 Elite, a flagship from years past, boasts impressive specs for its time. Now, it faces off against the modern Samsung Galaxy A54, a popular mid-range contender. Can the older flagship still compete with today's technology? Let's dive in and find out.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner. While the Xplay5 Elite had impressive specs for 2016, the A54's modern chipset, brighter display, and longer software support make it a more practical and future-proof choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | TD-SCDMA | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2016, March. Released 2016, March | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 153.5 x 76.2 x 7.6 mm (6.04 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 167.8 g (5.93 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~541 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.43 inches, 81.3 cm2 (~69.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core (2x2.15 GHz Kryo & 2x1.6 GHz Kryo) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 (14 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 530 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 6.0 (Marshmallow), Funtouch 2.6 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.4 | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 32-bit/192kHz audio
| - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3600 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver, Gold, Rose Gold | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | - | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 610 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -92.9dB / Crosstalk -85.5dB | - |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 85h
|
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 7160 (nominal), 3.983 (sunlight) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 62dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 66dB
|
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 2175Basemark X: 35180 |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Xplay5 Elite
- High contrast ratio (nominal)
- Unique design (subjective)
- Powerful for its time
- Outdated chipset
- Dim display
- Limited software support
- Slower charging
- Older battery technology
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Bright and vibrant display
- Modern chipset and performance
- Excellent camera system
- Long battery life
- Regular software updates
- Faster charging
- Plastic build (compared to premium materials)
- Mid-range processor (not flagship level)
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A54's display is significantly better. Its 980 nits max brightness offers excellent visibility outdoors, a feature the Xplay5 Elite lacks. While the Xplay5 Elite's contrast ratio is technically higher (7160 vs Infinite), real-world sunlight performance (3.983) is far inferior to the A54. The A54 also likely has a more modern panel technology (e.g., AMOLED) offering better color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A54's camera system is superior. While both offer Photo/Video capabilities, the A54 benefits from modern image processing, larger sensors, and likely better low-light performance. The Xplay5 Elite's camera was good for 2016, but it can't compete with the A54's advancements.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 provides a smoother and more efficient experience. The Snapdragon 820 in the Xplay5 Elite was powerful for its time, but modern apps and operating systems demand more processing power. The A54's octa-core CPU and 5nm process offer a noticeable performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54 wins on battery life. Its endurance rating of 119h is significantly higher than the Xplay5 Elite's 85h. The A54 also supports faster 25W charging compared to the Xplay5 Elite's 18W.
Buying Guide
The vivo Xplay5 Elite is for enthusiasts seeking a nostalgic look at a high-end phone from 2016, or those who appreciate its unique design. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is ideal for everyday users who want a reliable, feature-rich phone with a great camera and long-term software updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo Xplay5 Elite still usable in 2024?
Yes, but it will be limited by its outdated software and slower performance. It's best suited for nostalgia or very basic tasks.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A54 has significantly better software support, including regular security updates and potentially OS upgrades.