Xiaomi 13 Pro vs. vivo X90s: Which Android Flagship Delivers More?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a more refined and consistently powerful experience, coupled with excellent battery life and versatile charging options. While the vivo X90s is no slouch, the Xiaomi’s broader feature set and slightly more polished software give it the edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X90s | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 88 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, June 26 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 30 | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197.5 / 201.5 / 202.2 / 203.5 g (6.98 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a+B2c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4810 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Red, Green | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | V2241HA | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | About 510 EUR | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X90s
- Superior Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Longer battery life (10:55h active use)
- Versatile charging options (wired, wireless, reverse)
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher price
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Extremely fast 120W wired charging (50% in 8 min)
- Strong camera software heritage from vivo
- Potentially more competitive pricing
- Powerful Dimensity 9200+ chipset
- Shorter battery life compared to Xiaomi
- Mediatek chipset may have less software optimization
Display Comparison
Both phones feature high-end displays, but the Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1253 nits, exceeding what we’d expect from the vivo X90s (no data provided, but likely lower). While both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the Xiaomi’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The Xiaomi’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior OLED panel, offering deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both, but the Xiaomi’s overall display experience is likely more impactful due to its brightness advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped for excellent photography and videography, but details beyond 'Photo / Video' are lacking. We can infer that the Xiaomi 13 Pro likely features a larger main sensor, given Xiaomi’s history with 1-inch sensors. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling superior image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. The vivo X90s, however, benefits from vivo’s strong camera software heritage and may excel in specific scenarios like portrait photography. Without sensor size and aperture data, a definitive camera winner is difficult to declare, but the Xiaomi’s processing power gives it a likely edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) features a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core, alongside 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 and 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 cores, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. The vivo X90s uses the Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) with a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 cores. While the X90s has a slightly higher clocked X3 core, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architecture and Qualcomm’s optimizations generally result in superior sustained performance and thermal management. The Xiaomi’s use of LPDDR5x RAM further enhances its memory bandwidth, contributing to smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Adreno GPU is also a step ahead of the Mali-G715 MC11 in the Dimensity 9200+, offering better gaming performance.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 10:55h and an endurance rating of 115h. The vivo X90s’ battery capacity is unknown, but its 120W wired charging (50% in 8 minutes) is comparable to the Xiaomi’s (100% in 19 minutes). However, the Xiaomi 13 Pro adds 50W wireless charging (100% in 36 minutes) and 10W reverse wireless charging, offering greater versatility. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s superior power efficiency also contributes to the Xiaomi’s longer battery life, offsetting any potential capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X90s if you prioritize a strong camera system and exceptionally fast 120W wired charging, and are comfortable with the Mediatek chipset’s software ecosystem. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you demand the absolute best performance, a longer-lasting battery, and the convenience of both fast wired and wireless charging, alongside a more established software experience.