Realme GT Neo 5 240W vs. vivo X90s: Which Flagship Delivers the Best Experience?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing absolute charging speed and raw gaming performance, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the clear winner. However, the vivo X90s offers a more polished overall experience with a potentially more efficient chipset and a focus on stability, making it ideal for everyday users and content creators.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X90s | Realme GT Neo 5 240W |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 88 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, June 26 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 30 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197.5 / 201.5 / 202.2 / 203.5 g (6.98 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a+B2c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min Reverse wired | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | 4810 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Red, Green | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | V2241HA | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 510 EUR | About 440 EUR |
vivo X90s
- Blazing-fast 240W charging for minimal downtime
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 delivers excellent gaming performance
- Potentially more aggressive pricing for performance-focused users
- Software experience may be less refined than vivo’s Funtouch OS
- Potential for higher thermal throttling under sustained load
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ offers strong performance and efficiency
- Likely more refined software experience with Funtouch OS
- Potential for better image quality and low-light performance
- Slower 120W charging compared to the GT Neo 5
- May be slightly more expensive than the GT Neo 5
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize 4nm chipsets, suggesting a focus on efficiency. However, display specifications are missing. Assuming both employ AMOLED panels (typical for this segment), the key differentiator will be peak brightness and PWM dimming frequency. Realme often prioritizes high peak brightness for outdoor visibility, while vivo tends to focus on color accuracy and eye comfort. Without specific data, it's difficult to declare a winner, but the X90s' brand reputation suggests a more color-accurate display.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but both brands are known for strong camera performance. The absence of specific sensor information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, given the X90s’ positioning, it likely features a larger main sensor and a more sophisticated image processing pipeline, prioritizing image quality and detail. The GT Neo 5 may lean towards more vibrant, social media-ready images. Without sensor size and aperture data, it's reasonable to assume the X90s has a slight advantage in low-light photography.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (3.19 GHz Cortex-X2) is a proven performer, but the vivo X90s’ Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (3.35 GHz Cortex-X3) boasts a higher clock speed on its prime core. This suggests a potential edge in single-core performance for the X90s. While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for its gaming prowess, the Dimensity 9200+’s architecture is newer and potentially more efficient, leading to less thermal throttling during sustained loads. The X90s’ LPDDR5x RAM configuration, if present, would further enhance its multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s headline feature is its 240W charging, achieving 50% charge in just 4 minutes and 100% in 10 minutes. This is significantly faster than the vivo X90s’ 120W charging (50% in 8 minutes). While the X90s’ charging is still rapid, the GT Neo 5 redefines the concept of fast charging. The actual battery capacity is unknown for both, but the GT Neo 5’s charging speed mitigates concerns about a potentially smaller battery size. The Dimensity 9200+ in the X90s may offer better power efficiency, potentially offsetting the charging speed difference in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X90s if you need a consistently smooth experience, value a refined software experience, and prioritize a balanced approach to performance and battery life. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you absolutely need the fastest charging available, frequently engage in demanding mobile gaming, and are willing to trade some software polish for peak power.