vivo X90s vs Honor Magic5 Pro: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and battery life, the Honor Magic5 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers superior sustained performance and efficiency, coupled with a brighter display and longer battery endurance. However, the vivo X90s’s 120W charging is a significant advantage for those who value speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X90s | Honor Magic5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 88 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, June 26 | 2023, February 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 30 | Available. Released 2023, March 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 162.9 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 197.5 / 201.5 / 202.2 / 203.5 g (6.98 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1312 x 2848 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 113.7 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MagicOS 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.12" 1.4µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/3.0, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", AF TOF 3D (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10-bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit audio stereo recording | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a+B2c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min Reverse wired | 66W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4810 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 5100 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5450 mAh (China only) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Red, Green | Black, Meadow Green, Blue, Purple, Orange |
| Models | V2241HA | PGT-AN10, PGT-N19 |
| Price | About 510 EUR | £ 799.99 / € 407.79 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | GeekBench: 4378 (v5.1), 5096 (v6) |
vivo X90s
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
- Potentially higher peak CPU clock speed
- Likely vibrant and color-accurate display
- Potentially lower battery life
- Dimensity 9200+ may throttle under sustained load
- Less efficient chipset compared to Snapdragon
Honor Magic5 Pro
- Superior battery life and endurance
- More efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slower 66W wired charging
- May prioritize natural color accuracy over vibrancy
- Higher price point (potentially)
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1227 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the X90s. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize high-refresh-rate OLED panels, the Magic5 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a superior panel with deeper blacks. The X90s may compensate with potentially more accurate color calibration, a common strength of vivo’s displays, but without specific data, it’s difficult to confirm. Bezels are likely comparable, given both phones target a premium aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The focus should be on image processing. Honor typically leans towards a more natural, realistic look, while vivo often employs more vibrant, saturated colors. The presence of OIS on both is expected, but the aperture and sensor size of the main cameras will be crucial differentiators. Without specific details, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the Magic5 Pro’s reputation for computational photography suggests a slight edge in challenging lighting conditions. We can safely ignore any 2MP macro lenses on either device.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor Magic5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is built for sustained performance and efficiency. Its CPU configuration – 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 – is optimized for multitasking and demanding applications. The vivo X90s’s Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) features a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3), but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s architectural improvements and superior GPU generally translate to better gaming performance and thermal management. Both utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the Snapdragon’s Adreno GPU is a clear advantage for graphics-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic5 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 12:06h of active use and a 115-hour endurance rating. While the vivo X90s’s battery capacity is unknown, the Magic5 Pro’s larger battery and more efficient chipset contribute to its superior longevity. However, the X90s counters with blazing-fast 120W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 8 minutes, significantly faster than the Magic5 Pro’s 66W wired and 50W wireless charging. The X90s also offers reverse wired charging, while the Magic5 Pro supports both wired and wireless reverse charging, albeit at a lower 5W wired output.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X90s if you absolutely need the fastest charging available in a flagship smartphone and prioritize peak CPU performance for short bursts. It’s ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost. Buy the Honor Magic5 Pro if you value sustained performance, exceptional battery life, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more refined overall user experience. This phone is geared towards power users and multimedia enthusiasts.