vivo X90s vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing speed, gaming, and incredibly fast charging, the vivo X90s is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 7 Pro excels in camera versatility and software experience, making it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X90s | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 88 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, June 26 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 30 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 197.5 / 201.5 / 202.2 / 203.5 g (6.98 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a+B2c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min Reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4810 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Red, Green | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | V2241HA | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 510 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X90s
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ chipset
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Limited information on camera sensor specs
- Software support may not match Google's commitment
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera capabilities and image processing
- Clean and intuitive software experience
- Long-term software support from Google
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Tensor G2 chipset prioritizes AI over raw performance
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the X90s’ display specs aren’t provided, vivo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The Pixel 7 Pro’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio, typical of OLED technology, delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. The absence of refresh rate information for the X90s is a gap, but both likely offer adaptive refresh rates for smooth scrolling. The Pixel 7 Pro’s display is a known quantity, offering a consistently excellent viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having excellent photo and video capabilities, but their approaches differ. The Pixel 7 Pro leverages Google’s computational photography prowess, utilizing AI to enhance image quality and provide features like Magic Eraser. The X90s, while details are limited, likely relies on a combination of hardware and software optimization. Sensor size and lens aperture data are missing for the X90s, making a direct comparison difficult. However, the Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing is renowned for its natural-looking results and consistent performance across various lighting conditions. The X90s will likely appeal to those who prefer a more vibrant, processed look.
Performance
The vivo X90s’ Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) chipset, with its Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, is designed for peak performance. This contrasts with the Google Tensor G2 (5nm) in the Pixel 7 Pro, which prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks over raw CPU horsepower, featuring a Cortex-X1 core clocked at 2.85 GHz. The Dimensity 9200+’s 4nm process should offer better thermal efficiency than the Tensor G2’s 5nm node, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The X90s is likely to excel in GPU-intensive tasks and gaming, while the Pixel 7 Pro shines in tasks like voice recognition and image processing.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite differing capacities (not specified for the X90s). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The vivo X90s’ 120W wired charging can replenish 50% of the battery in just 8 minutes, a significant advantage over the Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging, which takes 30 minutes for the same result. The X90s also offers reverse wired charging, while the Pixel 7 Pro adds 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging. The X90s prioritizes speed, while the Pixel 7 Pro offers more charging flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X90s if you need a phone that can power through demanding tasks, charges from 0-50% in under 10 minutes, and offers a smooth, responsive experience. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a phone with exceptional camera capabilities, a clean and intuitive software experience, and long-term software support, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power and charging speed.