vivo X90 vs vivo V27 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X90 boasts a significantly faster chipset and quicker charging, making it ideal for power users and gamers. However, the V27 Pro shines with its exceptional battery life and vibrant display, offering a more balanced experience for everyday use. The X90 is the performance king, while the V27 Pro prioritizes longevity and visual appeal.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X90 | vivo V27 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 22 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 30 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g / 200 g (6.91 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| IP64 dust/water resistant | Color changing back panel color | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB UFS 3.1 - 128GB | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min Reverse wired | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min, 72% in 30 min |
| Type | 4810 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Asteroid Black, Breeze Blue, Red | Magic Blue, Noble Black |
| Models | V2241A | V2230 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.1 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 846767 (v9) GeekBench: 3933 (v5.1), 3421 (v6) GFXBench: 57fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X90
- Superior Performance (Dimensity 9200)
- Blazing-Fast 120W Charging
- Excellent Image Processing
- Premium Build Quality
- Battery Life Not as Impressive as V27 Pro
- Potentially Higher Price
vivo V27 Pro
- Exceptional Battery Life (121h Endurance Rating)
- Bright and Vibrant Display (978 nits)
- Stylish Design
- Competitive Price
- Less Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 8200)
- Slower Charging (66W)
- Image Processing May Be Over-Saturated for Some
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 Pro takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 978 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the X90's display is also good, it doesn't reach the same level of brightness. The V27 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors, further enhancing the viewing experience. Both phones likely feature AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer excellent camera capabilities, but with different strengths. The V27 Pro is known for its vibrant and often saturated color processing, appealing to those who prefer eye-catching photos. The X90, leveraging its more powerful processor, likely offers better image processing and low-light performance. Specific camera specs (megapixels, sensor sizes) would be needed for a more precise comparison, but both are expected to deliver high-quality results.
Performance
The vivo X90's Dimensity 9200 chipset is the clear winner here. It's significantly more powerful than the V27 Pro's Dimensity 8200, offering noticeably faster processing speeds and smoother multitasking. Gamers and users who frequently run demanding applications will appreciate the X90's superior performance. The X90's 4nm process also contributes to better efficiency.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 Pro dominates the battery life category. Its endurance rating of 121h is exceptional, suggesting it can easily last a full day or even longer on a single charge. The X90, while having a decent battery, doesn't match the V27 Pro's longevity. However, the X90's 120W charging significantly reduces charging times, offsetting some of the battery life difference.
Buying Guide
The vivo X90 is perfect for users who prioritize raw performance, demanding gaming, and fast charging. It's a great choice for those who want a flagship-level experience without the flagship price tag. The vivo V27 Pro is best suited for users who value long battery life, a stunning display for media consumption, and a stylish design. It's an excellent option for everyday users and social media enthusiasts.