vivo X90 vs vivo V27: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X90 takes the crown for raw power and charging speed thanks to its Dimensity 9200 chipset and 120W charging. However, the V27 shines with its impressive display brightness and potentially longer battery life, making it a compelling choice for everyday users prioritizing aesthetics and endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X90 | vivo V27 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 22 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 30 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g / 200 g (6.91 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| IP64 dust/water resistant | Color changing back panel color | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB UFS 3.1 - 128GB | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min Reverse wired | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 4810 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Asteroid Black, Breeze Blue, Red | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Models | V2241A | V2231, V2246 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 134h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X90
- Superior Performance (Dimensity 9200)
- Blazing-Fast 120W Charging
- Likely Better Camera System
- Premium Build Quality
- Potentially Higher Price
- Battery Endurance Not Explicitly Highlighted
- May be Overkill for Casual Users
vivo V27
- Brighter Display (1055 nits)
- Excellent Battery Life (134h Endurance)
- Stylish Design
- More Affordable
- Lower Performance (Dimensity 7200)
- Slower Charging (66W)
- Camera Likely Not as Advanced
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1055 nits, significantly brighter than the X90 (estimated around 800-900 nits). While the X90 likely has better color accuracy, the V27's brightness makes it more usable outdoors. The V27's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal claim, but suggests strong contrast performance.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, but the X90 is expected to have a more advanced camera system, likely with a larger sensor and better image processing. While specific details are missing, the X90's higher-tier chipset often translates to better computational photography. The V27's camera is still capable, but likely not on par with the X90.
Performance
The X90's Dimensity 9200 chipset is a clear winner here. It offers significantly more processing power than the V27's Dimensity 7200, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance. The X90's CPU configuration also gives it an edge in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The V27 claims an impressive endurance rating of 134 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The X90, while having a decent battery, doesn't explicitly highlight endurance. However, its 120W charging allows it to replenish its battery much faster (50% in 8 minutes vs. 19 minutes for the V27).
Buying Guide
The vivo X90 is ideal for power users, mobile gamers, and photography enthusiasts who demand top-tier performance and fast charging. The vivo V27 is a great pick for those seeking a stylish phone with a vibrant display, good camera capabilities, and excellent battery life without breaking the bank.