Honor Magic5 Pro vs vivo X90: A Deep Dive into Android Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery life, the Honor Magic5 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and impressive 12:06h active use score provide a smoother, longer-lasting experience, despite the X90’s faster wired charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X90 | Honor Magic5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 22 | 2023, February 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 30 | Available. Released 2023, March 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 162.9 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 196 g / 200 g (6.91 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| IP64 dust/water resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1312 x 2848 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 113.7 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MagicOS 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB UFS 3.1 - 128GB | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.12" 1.4µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/3.0, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", AF TOF 3D (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10-bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit audio stereo recording | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min Reverse wired | 66W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4810 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 5100 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5450 mAh (China only) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Asteroid Black, Breeze Blue, Red | Black, Meadow Green, Blue, Purple, Orange |
| Models | V2241A | PGT-AN10, PGT-N19 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | £ 799.99 / € 407.79 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | GeekBench: 4378 (v5.1), 5096 (v6) |
vivo X90
- Incredibly fast 120W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- MediaTek Dimensity 9200 offers strong performance
- Battery life likely inferior to the Magic5 Pro
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Display brightness likely lower than the Magic5 Pro
Honor Magic5 Pro
- Superior battery life and endurance
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides top-tier performance
- Brighter and potentially more accurate display
- Slower wired charging compared to the X90
- Higher price tag
- Wireless charging is slower than wired
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1227 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the vivo X90. While both likely utilize OLED technology, the Magic5 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience, particularly in direct sunlight. The absence of PWM frequency data for the X90 raises potential concerns for users sensitive to flicker, while the Magic5 Pro’s display is likely optimized for color accuracy and viewing angles, typical of flagship panels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The focus should be on image processing. Honor typically emphasizes natural color reproduction, while vivo often leans towards more vibrant, saturated images. The absence of specific aperture or sensor size details makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is known for its advanced computational photography capabilities, potentially giving the Magic5 Pro an edge in low-light performance and dynamic range. We can assume both offer capable video recording, but the Magic5 Pro’s ISP likely provides more advanced stabilization and encoding options.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor Magic5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) features a 3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core, slightly faster than the X90’s Dimensity 9200’s 3.05 GHz Cortex-X3. The Snapdragon also employs a more balanced core configuration (1+2+2+3) versus the Dimensity’s (1+3+4), potentially leading to more efficient multi-tasking. The 4nm fabrication process of both chips is comparable, but Qualcomm’s optimizations generally result in better thermal management and sustained performance under heavy load. The Magic5 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM further contributes to faster data access and overall responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic5 Pro’s endurance rating of 115 hours and 12:06h active use score clearly demonstrate superior battery life compared to the X90’s unspecified figures. While the X90 compensates with a blazing-fast 120W wired charging (50% in 8 minutes), the Magic5 Pro’s 66W wired and 50W wireless charging are still respectable. The inclusion of reverse wireless charging on both devices is a convenient feature, but the Magic5 Pro’s 5W reverse wired charging is a niche addition. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s efficiency plays a crucial role in the Magic5 Pro’s extended battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X90 if you prioritize incredibly fast 120W wired charging and are comfortable with the MediaTek Dimensity 9200’s performance profile. This phone is ideal for users who frequently top up their battery and appreciate a more affordable flagship experience. Buy the Honor Magic5 Pro if you demand the absolute best in sustained performance, exceptional battery endurance (115h rating), and a brighter, more vibrant display. This is the phone for power users, mobile gamers, and those who value a premium, all-around experience.