vivo X90 vs Honor Magic5: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor Magic5 takes the crown thanks to its superior Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, slightly better overall camera performance, and more refined software experience. While the vivo X90’s 120W charging is a standout, the Magic5’s balance of power, camera, and software makes it the more compelling choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X90 | Honor Magic5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 22 | 2023, February 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 30 | Available. Released 2023, March 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm | 161.4 x 75.5 x 7.8 mm (6.35 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g / 200 g (6.91 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| IP64 dust/water resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) | 1224 x 2688 pixels (~439 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, MagicOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB UFS 3.1 - 128GB | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF 32 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.5", AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10-bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit audio stereo recording | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min Reverse wired | 66W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4810 mAh | Li-Po 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Asteroid Black, Breeze Blue, Red | Black, Glacier Blue, Green, Purple, Orange |
| Models | V2241A | PGT-AN00, PGT-N09 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 900 EUR |
vivo X90
- Incredibly fast 120W charging
- Vibrant and smooth display
- Excellent portrait mode camera
- Stylish design
- Dimensity 9200 performance slightly behind Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Software experience could be more refined
- Camera consistency not always as good as Magic5
Honor Magic5
- Top-tier Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Versatile and consistent camera system
- Longer battery life
- Polished and feature-rich software
- Slower charging compared to vivo X90
- Design might not appeal to everyone
- Reverse wired charging is slower
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent OLED displays with high refresh rates (120Hz). The Magic5's display is slightly brighter and arguably more color-accurate, offering a marginally better viewing experience. The X90's display is still fantastic, though, with vibrant colors and smooth scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Both phones have impressive camera systems. The Magic5 generally produces more consistent and natural-looking images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The X90 excels in portrait mode with its signature bokeh effect. Video recording is excellent on both, with the Magic5 offering slightly better stabilization.
Performance
The Honor Magic5's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a noticeable performance edge over the vivo X90's Dimensity 9200. While both phones handle demanding tasks with ease, the Magic5 exhibits smoother multitasking and slightly faster gaming performance. The Snapdragon's efficiency also contributes to better thermal management.
Battery Life
The vivo X90's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast charging times. However, the Honor Magic5's larger battery capacity provides slightly longer battery life under typical usage. While the Magic5's charging is slower (66W), it still offers respectable charging speeds.
Buying Guide
The vivo X90 is ideal for users prioritizing incredibly fast charging and a vibrant display. The Honor Magic5 is best suited for those seeking top-tier performance, a versatile camera system, and a polished user experience.