vivo X90 Pro+ vs Xiaomi 13 Pro: A Deep Dive into Android Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing the absolute fastest charging and a potentially more versatile camera system, the Xiaomi 13 Pro takes a slight edge. Its 120W charging completes a full charge in just 19 minutes, significantly faster than the vivo’s 33-minute timeframe. However, the vivo X90 Pro+ remains a strong contender, offering a refined experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X90 Pro+ | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 22 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 06 | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in) | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 221 g (7.80 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch (Global), OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 33 min 50W wireless Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Red | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | V2227A | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | About 1030 EUR | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X90 Pro+
- Potentially superior camera sensor size for low-light performance
- Refined and balanced user experience (based on brand reputation)
- 80W wired and 50W wireless charging offers convenience
- Slower charging speed compared to Xiaomi 13 Pro (33 minutes vs 19 minutes)
- Limited display brightness information
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging (19 minutes to full)
- High peak display brightness (1253 nits)
- Excellent battery endurance (115h rating)
- Potential for more thermal throttling under sustained load
- Image processing style may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1253 nits, which translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the vivo X90 Pro+’s display specifications aren’t provided, both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life. The Xiaomi’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a high-quality OLED panel, but without detailed color accuracy data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner in image quality beyond peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. The absence of sensor size information is a significant omission. However, given vivo’s history, the X90 Pro+ likely features a larger primary sensor, potentially offering better low-light performance and dynamic range. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s camera system is expected to be highly competitive, leveraging Xiaomi’s image processing expertise. Without detailed analysis of image samples and video quality, it’s difficult to determine a clear winner, but the potential for a larger sensor on the vivo is a key differentiator.
Performance
Both devices are equipped with the Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset, featuring an identical CPU configuration: 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510. This ensures comparable raw processing power. However, thermal management and sustained performance could differ. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s larger surface area might offer slightly better heat dissipation, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions, though this requires independent testing. Both likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s 120W wired charging, completing a full charge in just 19 minutes, is a significant advantage over the vivo X90 Pro+'s 80W charging (33 minutes). Both support 50W wireless charging, with the Xiaomi taking 36 minutes to fully charge wirelessly. The Xiaomi 13 Pro also boasts an endurance rating of 115 hours, matching the vivo X90 Pro+, suggesting comparable battery optimization despite the difference in charging speeds. The Xiaomi’s active use score of 10:55h provides a more concrete measure of real-world battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X90 Pro+ if you value a balanced experience with a focus on camera versatility and a premium build. It’s ideal for photography enthusiasts who want a reliable and feature-rich imaging system. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you prioritize blazing-fast charging speeds and extended battery endurance, making it perfect for power users who are constantly on the go and need minimal downtime.