vivo X90 Pro+ vs Huawei Mate 50 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Android Rivals
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo X90 Pro+ emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers a noticeable performance uplift, and the 80W wired charging is significantly faster than the Mate 50 Pro’s 66W. While the Mate 50 Pro boasts excellent battery life, the X90 Pro+ offers a more future-proof and powerful experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X90 Pro+ | Huawei Mate 50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 22 | 2022, September 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 06 | Available. Released 2022, September 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in) | 162.1 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 221 g (7.80 oz) | 205 g / 209 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 6m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Huawei Kunlun Glass |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) | 1212 x 2616 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~428 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 111.8 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 4G (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch (Global), OriginOS 3 (China) | EMUI 13 (International), HarmonyOS 3.0 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 24mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480fps, 720p@960fps, 720p@3840fps, HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | BDS Satellite Message (sending only) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 33 min 50W wireless Reverse wired | 66W wired 50W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Red | Black, Silver, Purple, Orange |
| Models | V2227A | DCO-AL00, DCO-LX9 |
| Price | About 1030 EUR | About 900 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 979921 (v9) GeekBench: 3839 (v5.1) GFXBench: 68fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X90 Pro+
- Significantly faster processor with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Battery capacity not specified
- Display specifications lacking detail
Huawei Mate 50 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (10:36h active use)
- High peak display brightness (946 nits)
- Refined camera experience (implied)
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Slower 66W wired charging
Display Comparison
The Huawei Mate 50 Pro’s display achieves a measured peak brightness of 946 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. However, the context data lacks specifics on the X90 Pro+'s display, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. Given vivo’s history with high-quality AMOLED panels, it’s likely comparable, but without measured data, we can’t confirm. Both displays boast an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of OLED technology. The absence of refresh rate information for the X90 Pro+ is a key omission; the Mate 50 Pro’s refresh rate is also not specified, hindering a complete assessment of display smoothness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed heavily on their camera capabilities, but the specifics are limited in the provided data. Both support Photo and Video capture. Without sensor size details, it’s difficult to assess image quality potential. However, the X90 Pro+’s newer image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 likely offers superior image processing algorithms, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. The lack of detail regarding OIS and lens apertures prevents a deeper analysis. The omission of any mention of zoom capabilities is also a significant gap in the data.
Performance
The vivo X90 Pro+’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a significant leap over the Huawei Mate 50 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Gen 2 features a redesigned CPU architecture – specifically the Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz versus the Mate 50 Pro’s Cortex-X2 at 3.19 GHz – promising up to 25% faster performance. The X90 Pro+’s CPU configuration (1+2+2+3) is also more balanced than the Mate 50 Pro’s (1+3+4). Crucially, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s improved 4nm process offers better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. The Mate 50 Pro is limited to 4G connectivity, a major drawback for users requiring fast mobile data speeds.
Battery Life
The Huawei Mate 50 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 104 hours, and a real-world active use score of 10:36h, indicating exceptional battery life. The vivo X90 Pro+’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 80W wired charging (100% in 33 minutes) is considerably faster than the Mate 50 Pro’s 66W charging. The X90 Pro+ also offers 50W wireless charging, matching the Mate 50 Pro, and includes reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Mate 50 Pro’s 5W reverse wireless. The faster charging speed of the X90 Pro+ mitigates any potential disadvantage from a potentially smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X90 Pro+ if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Huawei Mate 50 Pro if you prioritize exceptional battery life, a refined camera experience, and are less concerned with having the absolute latest chipset, or if 5G connectivity is not a necessity.