vivo X90 Pro+ vs Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Android
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users demanding peak performance and rapid charging, the vivo X90 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 7 Pro’s Tensor G2 and 23W charging. However, the Pixel 7 Pro remains a compelling choice for those prioritizing Google’s software and camera processing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X90 Pro+ | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 22 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 06 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 221 g (7.80 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch (Global), OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 33 min 50W wireless Reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4700 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Red | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | V2227A | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 1030 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X90 Pro+
- Significantly faster charging (80W wired)
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Potential for superior image quality (hardware-focused camera)
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
- Availability may be limited in some regions
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional computational photography
- Clean and intuitive software experience
- Wide availability and strong brand recognition
- Slower charging speeds (23W wired)
- Less powerful processor (Tensor G2)
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7 Pro boasts a bright display, reaching a measured 1090 nits peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility outdoors. While the X90 Pro+’s display specs aren’t provided, vivo typically employs high-quality panels. The Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience for content consumption. However, without knowing the X90 Pro+'s panel technology (LTPO or not) and PWM dimming rate, a definitive judgment on eye comfort is impossible. The Pixel 7 Pro’s display is a known quantity, delivering a consistently excellent visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as camera powerhouses, but approach image capture differently. The X90 Pro+’s camera specs are not fully detailed, but vivo’s recent flagships have featured large sensors and advanced optics. The Pixel 7 Pro relies heavily on Google’s computational photography prowess, leveraging its Tensor G2 chip for features like Super Res Zoom and Magic Eraser. While the Pixel 7 Pro delivers consistently excellent results in various conditions, the X90 Pro+ potentially offers greater dynamic range and detail thanks to its hardware. Without knowing the sensor sizes and apertures of the X90 Pro+, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the X90 Pro+’s potential for hardware-driven image quality is significant.
Performance
The vivo X90 Pro+’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) chipset represents a significant leap in performance over the Google Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s octa-core configuration – featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz – promises substantially faster CPU performance compared to the Pixel 7 Pro’s Cortex-X1 cores at 2.85 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 also offers improved thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Pixel 7 Pro’s Tensor G2 excels in AI and machine learning tasks, but falls behind in raw processing power. The X90 Pro+ is the clear choice for power users and gamers.
Battery Life
Both the vivo X90 Pro+ and Google Pixel 7 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable battery life in typical usage scenarios. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The X90 Pro+ supports 80W wired charging, reaching 100% in just 33 minutes, and 50W wireless charging. The Pixel 7 Pro is limited to 23W wired charging (PD3.0) and 23W wireless charging, taking approximately 30 minutes to reach 50% with wired charging. This makes the X90 Pro+ significantly more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The X90 Pro+ also offers reverse wired charging, a feature not explicitly mentioned for the Pixel 7 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X90 Pro+ if you need uncompromising processing power for gaming or demanding applications, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, exceptional computational photography, and a more balanced overall package, even if it means sacrificing some raw performance.