Sony Xperia 1 VII vs. vivo X90 Pro: A Flagship Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and incredibly fast charging, the vivo X90 Pro emerges as the winner. Its 96-hour endurance rating and 120W charging significantly outperform the Xperia 1 VII. However, the Xperia 1 VII’s Snapdragon 8 Elite and superior display brightness cater to power users and content creators.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X90 Pro | Sony Xperia 1 VII |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 22 | 2025, May 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 06 | Available. Released 2025, June 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.5 x 9.3 mm (6.46 x 2.93 x 0.37 in) | 162 x 74 x 8.2 mm (6.38 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 214.9 g (7.58 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Adreno 830 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), OriginOS 3 (China) | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 108˚ 16mm (ultrawide), AF | 48 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.35", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 85mm (telephoto), f/3.5, 170mm (telephoto), 1/3.5", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, 3.5x-7.1x continuous optical zoom, OIS, 4cm macro @ 120mm, no AF 48 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 6.0, A2DP, LE Audio, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min 50W wireless Reverse wired | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4870 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Legendary Black, Red | Moss Green, Orchid Purple, Slate Black |
| Models | V2242A, V2219 | XQ-FS54, XQFS54EUKCG.GC, XQFS54EUKCV.GC, XQFS54EUKCB.GC, PDX256 |
| Price | About 1200 EUR | € 1,338.99 / $ 1,394.99 / £ 1,149.94 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 96h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1228735 (v9) GeekBench: 4273 (v5.1) GFXBench: 74fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 43:30h endurance, 1400 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class B (181 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class D |
vivo X90 Pro
- Incredibly fast 120W charging
- Exceptional 96-hour battery endurance
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Potentially competitive camera system (details pending)
- Chipset is a generation behind the Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Display brightness lower than the Xperia 1 VII
- Limited display specifications (refresh rate, panel type)
Sony Xperia 1 VII
- Top-tier Snapdragon 8 Elite performance
- Significantly brighter display for HDR content
- Long-term battery health with 1400 charge cycles
- Sony’s renowned camera image processing
- Slower 30W charging speed
- Lower battery endurance rating compared to the X90 Pro
- Higher price point likely
Display Comparison
The Sony Xperia 1 VII boasts a significantly brighter display at 1475 nits, exceeding the vivo X90 Pro’s 934 nits. This brightness advantage translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. While both displays feature an infinite contrast ratio, the Xperia 1 VII’s higher peak brightness is crucial for HDR content consumption and professional photo/video editing. The X90 Pro’s display specifications lack details on refresh rate or panel technology, suggesting a standard experience compared to the Xperia’s likely LTPO OLED panel, offering variable refresh rates for power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are positioned as camera-centric, but details are limited. The lack of specific sensor information for the vivo X90 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult. However, Sony’s history suggests a focus on image quality and color science, likely leveraging a large sensor with advanced image processing. The Xperia 1 VII’s camera system benefits from Sony’s expertise in image sensor technology and processing algorithms. Without detailed specs on the X90 Pro’s camera, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities beyond ‘Photo/Video’ functionality. The Xperia 1 VII’s pro-grade features, such as manual controls and advanced video recording options, cater to experienced photographers and videographers.
Performance
The Xperia 1 VII’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) represents a substantial leap in performance and efficiency over the vivo X90 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Elite utilizes Oryon V2 Phoenix cores, offering higher clock speeds (up to 4.32 GHz) and improved IPC compared to the Cortex-X3 in the Dimensity 9200. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The 3nm process node further enhances thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Dimensity 9200 is no slouch, the Snapdragon 8 Elite provides a clear advantage for demanding users.
Battery Life
The vivo X90 Pro’s 96-hour endurance rating is a standout feature, significantly exceeding the Xperia 1 VII’s 43:30h endurance. This difference is partially offset by the Xperia 1 VII’s larger battery capacity (unspecified, but implied to be larger than what’s needed for 43:30h) and its impressive 1400 charge cycles, promising long-term battery health. However, the X90 Pro’s 120W wired charging (50% in 8 minutes) is dramatically faster than the Xperia 1 VII’s 30W charging (50% in 30 minutes). The X90 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging and reverse wired charging, features absent or less powerful on the Xperia 1 VII.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X90 Pro if you need exceptional battery life, blazing-fast charging, and a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 VII if you prioritize top-tier processing power for demanding applications, a brighter and more color-accurate display for content creation, and a longer-term battery health promise with its 1400 cycle lifespan.