vivo X90 Pro+ vs vivo X90 Pro: A Detailed Showdown

vivo's X series consistently delivers impressive camera capabilities and premium design. The X90 Pro+ and X90 Pro are the latest contenders, boasting cutting-edge technology. But which one offers the best overall experience? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and features to help you decide.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The vivo X90 Pro+ takes the crown with its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, offering superior performance and potentially better sustained speeds. However, the X90 Pro's blazing 120W charging and excellent endurance make it a compelling alternative, especially for those prioritizing battery life and value.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X90 Pro+ vivo X90 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE-A, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1xEV-DO 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China
Launch
Announced2022, November 222022, November 22
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, December 06Available. Released 2022, December 06
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frame, eco leather backGlass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back
Dimensions164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in)164.1 x 74.5 x 9.3 mm (6.46 x 2.93 x 0.37 in)
SIMDual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight221 g (7.80 oz)214.9 g (7.58 oz)
 IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
Resolution1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density)1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak)AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 740Immortalis-G715 MC11
OSAndroid 13, Funtouch (Global), Origin OS 3 (China)Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), OriginOS 3 (China)
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Main Camera
FeaturesZeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panoramaLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Quad50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF-
Single32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Triple-50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 108˚ 16mm (ultrawide), AF
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30/60fps1080p@30/60fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jack-No
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 32-bit/192kHz audio24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrumFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging80W wired, 100% in 33 min (advertised) 50W wireless Reverse wired120W wired, 50% in 8 min 50W wireless Reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable4870 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, RedLegendary Black, Red
ModelsV2227AV2242A, V2219
PriceAbout 1030 EURAbout 1200 EUR
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 96h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -24.5 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 1228735 (v9) GeekBench: 4273 (v5.1) GFXBench: 74fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo X90 Pro+

  • Superior Performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
  • Potentially Better Camera (Advanced Sensor)
  • Faster Charging (80W)
  • Premium Build Quality

  • Higher Price
  • Battery life slightly less than X90 Pro

vivo X90 Pro

  • Blazing Fast 120W Charging
  • Exceptional Battery Life (96h Endurance)
  • Excellent Camera System
  • More Affordable

  • Slightly Lower Performance (Dimensity 9200)
  • Potentially Less Advanced Camera

Display Comparison

Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays with vibrant colors and smooth 120Hz refresh rates. The X90 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 934 nits, while the X90 Pro+ likely offers similar brightness levels. The X90 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but suggests deep blacks. Overall, display performance is comparable, with a slight edge to the X90 Pro due to the measured brightness data.

Camera Comparison

Both phones feature impressive camera systems, but with different strengths. The X90 Pro+ is expected to have a more advanced primary sensor and potentially better image processing due to the Snapdragon's ISP. The X90 Pro's camera is still excellent, offering great image quality and versatile shooting modes. Detailed camera comparisons will require extensive testing, but the X90 Pro+ is likely to have a slight edge in overall camera performance.

Performance

The X90 Pro+’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a noticeable performance advantage over the X90 Pro’s Dimensity 9200. While both chipsets are powerful, the Snapdragon generally excels in sustained performance and efficiency, particularly under heavy load. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading on the X90 Pro+.

Battery Life

The X90 Pro shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 96 hours. While the X90 Pro+'s battery life is still good, it doesn't match the X90 Pro's longevity. The X90 Pro's 120W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast charging times (50% in just 8 minutes), significantly faster than the X90 Pro+'s 80W charging.

Buying Guide

The vivo X90 Pro+ is ideal for power users, mobile gamers, and photography enthusiasts who demand the absolute best performance and camera capabilities. The vivo X90 Pro is a great choice for users who prioritize fast charging, long battery life, and a premium camera experience at a slightly more accessible price point.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 significantly better than the Dimensity 9200?
While both are flagship chipsets, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 generally offers better sustained performance and efficiency, especially under heavy load. The Dimensity 9200 is still very capable, but the Snapdragon has a slight edge.
❓ Which phone has the better camera for casual users?
Both offer excellent camera systems. The X90 Pro is likely more than sufficient for most casual users, providing great image quality and versatile shooting modes. The X90 Pro+ may offer slightly better image processing and detail, but the difference is likely subtle for everyday use.