vivo X90 Pro+ vs vivo iQOO 11: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The iQOO 11 takes the lead with its blazing-fast 120W charging and potentially brighter display. However, the X90 Pro+ boasts a more refined camera system and a premium design. Ultimately, the iQOO 11 is for speed demons, while the X90 Pro+ caters to photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X90 Pro+ | vivo iQOO 11 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 22 | 2022, December 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 06 | Available. Released 2022, December 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 221 g (7.80 oz) | 205 g or 208 g (7.23 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.5, 47mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 33 min (advertised) 50W wireless Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 25 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Red | Black, Green, White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | V2227A | V2243A |
| Price | About 1030 EUR | About 650 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 127h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281665 (v9) GeekBench: 4803 (v5.1) GFXBench: 67fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X90 Pro+
- Superior camera system
- Premium design and build quality
- Refined software experience
- Wireless charging
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower charging speed compared to iQOO 11
- Potentially higher price
vivo iQOO 11
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Potentially brighter display
- Excellent battery life (127h endurance)
- Strong gaming performance
- Camera not as refined as X90 Pro+
- Design may be less premium
- Software experience might be less polished
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays, but the iQOO 11's measured 1147 nits peak brightness gives it an edge in outdoor visibility. The X90 Pro+ likely has more accurate color calibration. The iQOO 11's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but suggests deep blacks. Resolution is likely similar, offering sharp visuals.
Camera Comparison
The X90 Pro+ is expected to have a superior camera system, likely featuring a larger primary sensor and more advanced image processing. While both offer excellent photo and video capabilities, the X90 Pro+ is likely to excel in low-light conditions and offer more creative control. The iQOO 11's camera is still very capable, but not as refined.
Performance
Powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, both phones deliver flagship-level performance. Expect smooth multitasking, demanding games running flawlessly, and snappy app launches. The iQOO 11's software optimization might give it a slight edge in gaming due to its focus on performance.
Battery Life
The iQOO 11 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 127h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the X90 Pro+'s 80W wired charging is slower than the iQOO 11's 120W charging, which can fully charge the phone in just 25 minutes. Wireless charging is also available on both.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo X90 Pro+? Photography lovers and those prioritizing a premium design and refined software experience. Who should buy the vivo iQOO 11? Gamers and users who demand the fastest charging speeds and a vibrant display, even if it means sacrificing some camera finesse.