vivo X80 vs vivo X90 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X90 Pro emerges as the clear winner, boasting significantly faster charging, a more powerful chipset, and a brighter display. While the X80 remains a capable device, the X90 Pro’s upgrades justify its higher price for users prioritizing performance and cutting-edge features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X80 | vivo X90 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 25 | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 29 | Available. Released 2022, December 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 165 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm or 8.8 mm | 164.1 x 74.5 x 9.3 mm (6.46 x 2.93 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g / 206 g (7.16 oz) | 214.9 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), OriginOS Ocean (China) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 108˚ 16mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4870 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Urban Blue, Orange | Legendary Black, Red |
| Models | V2183A, V2144 | V2242A, V2219 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 1200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1228735 (v9) GeekBench: 4273 (v5.1) GFXBench: 74fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X80
- Excellent camera system
- Reliable performance
- Fast 80W charging
- Sleek design
- Good value for money
- Slightly older chipset
- Lower peak brightness display
- Charging speed slower than X90 Pro
vivo X90 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Powerful Dimensity 9200 chipset
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Potentially superior camera performance
- 50W wireless charging
- Higher price
- Potential for overheating under heavy load
- Larger size/weight (likely)
Display Comparison
The vivo X90 Pro takes the lead with a measured peak brightness of 934 nits, significantly brighter than the X80. Its 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests exceptional image depth. While the X80’s display is excellent, the X90 Pro’s offers a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. Both feature AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature excellent camera systems, but the X90 Pro likely has an edge due to its newer sensor technology and image processing algorithms. While specific camera specs are not fully detailed, the X90 Pro's reputation suggests superior low-light performance and video recording capabilities. Both offer versatile lens setups.
Performance
The Dimensity 9200 in the X90 Pro provides a noticeable performance boost over the Dimensity 9000 in the X80. The Cortex-X3 core in the 9200 offers improved single-core performance, while the overall architecture delivers faster processing speeds. Expect smoother multitasking and quicker app loading times on the X90 Pro. Both phones handle demanding games well.
Battery Life
The X90 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, reaching 50% in just 8 minutes, compared to the X80’s 11 minutes at 80W. Both offer reverse wired charging. While the X80 boasts an impressive 96-hour endurance rating, the X90 Pro likely matches or exceeds this with its optimized power management and more efficient chipset.
Buying Guide
The vivo X80 is ideal for users seeking a premium smartphone experience with a strong camera and reliable performance at a slightly more accessible price point. The vivo X90 Pro is for power users and photography enthusiasts who demand the absolute best in performance, charging speed, and display quality, and are willing to pay a premium.