vivo X80 vs vivo X70 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X80 boasts a significantly faster Dimensity 9000 chipset and faster charging, making it the performance leader. However, the X70 Pro's excellent display and proven battery endurance remain compelling, especially if you prioritize those aspects. The X80 is the clear winner for power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X80 | vivo X70 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 3, 5, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 25 | 2021, September 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 29 | Available. Released 2021, September 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm or 8.8 mm | 158.3 x 73.2 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g / 206 g (7.16 oz) | 183/184/185/186 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - China |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) - InternationalExynos 1080 (5 nm) - China |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G77 MC9 - InternationalMali-G78 MP10 - China |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), OriginOS Ocean (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired | 44W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4450 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Urban Blue, Orange | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White |
| Models | V2183A, V2144 | V2134A, V2105 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 1040 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 694499 (v9) GeekBench: 2956 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X80
- Significantly faster performance (Dimensity 9000)
- 80W fast charging
- Likely improved camera processing
- Modern design
- Battery life potentially slightly lower than X70 Pro
- Price likely higher
vivo X70 Pro
- Excellent display brightness (993 nits)
- Proven long battery life (123h endurance)
- Refined camera system
- Potentially lower price
- Slower performance (Dimensity 1200/Exynos 1080)
- Slower 44W charging
- Older chipset
Display Comparison
The vivo X70 Pro shines with its measured 993 nits peak brightness, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the X80's display is also high quality, specific brightness figures are harder to confirm. The X70 Pro's infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors. Both phones likely feature AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates, but the X70 Pro has a slight edge in measured brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature excellent camera systems, but with different strengths. The X70 Pro is known for its color science and overall image quality, particularly in well-lit conditions. The X80 likely benefits from improved image processing thanks to its newer chipset and potentially enhanced computational photography features. Both likely offer versatile camera setups with wide, ultrawide, and telephoto lenses. Detailed camera comparisons would require extensive testing.
Performance
Here, the vivo X80 takes a commanding lead. The Dimensity 9000 is a substantial upgrade over the Dimensity 1200 (or Exynos 1080) found in the X70 Pro. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games. The X80's Cortex-X2 core provides a significant boost in single-core performance.
Battery Life
The vivo X70 Pro has a strong reputation for battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 123h. While the X80's battery capacity is likely similar, the more power-hungry Dimensity 9000 chipset might slightly impact endurance. However, the X80's 80W wired charging is significantly faster than the X70 Pro's 44W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo X80 is ideal for users who demand top-tier performance, fast charging, and the latest technology. The vivo X70 Pro is a great choice for those prioritizing a vibrant display, long battery life, and a refined camera experience, particularly if budget is a consideration.