vivo X80 vs vivo V27: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X80 offers significantly superior performance thanks to its Dimensity 9000 chipset and faster charging. However, the V27 boasts a brighter display and potentially better value for users prioritizing battery life and a stylish design. The X80 is the performance king, while the V27 excels in endurance and display brightness.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X80 | vivo V27 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 25 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 29 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 165 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm or 8.8 mm | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g / 206 g (7.16 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| - | Color changing back panel color | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR, 1500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), OriginOS Ocean (China) | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Urban Blue, Orange | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Models | V2183A, V2144 | V2231, V2246 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 134h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X80
- Superior Performance (Dimensity 9000)
- Faster Charging (80W)
- Likely better camera system (Zeiss co-engineered)
- Premium Build Quality
- Potentially higher price
- Battery life not as exceptional as V27
- Specific camera details are limited
vivo V27
- Exceptional Battery Life (134h endurance)
- Brighter Display (1055 nits)
- Stylish Design
- More Affordable
- Lower Performance (Dimensity 7200)
- Slower Charging (66W)
- Camera performance potentially less advanced
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 takes the lead in display brightness, reaching a measured 1055 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the X80's display is also good, it doesn't match the V27's peak brightness. The V27's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal claim, but suggests strong contrast performance. Both phones likely feature AMOLED panels with vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specs are missing. Generally, the X80 series is known for its advanced camera systems, often featuring co-engineered optics with Zeiss. The V27 likely focuses on appealing selfie and portrait capabilities. A direct comparison would require detailed camera testing.
Performance
The vivo X80's Dimensity 9000 chipset is a clear winner here. It's significantly more powerful than the V27's Dimensity 7200, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The X80's Cortex-X2 core provides a substantial performance boost.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 134 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the X80 also has a decent battery, the V27's endurance rating indicates a significant advantage. The X80's 80W charging is faster, reaching 50% in 11 minutes, compared to the V27's 66W (19 minutes).
Buying Guide
The vivo X80 is ideal for power users, gamers, and those who demand top-tier performance and fast charging. The vivo V27 is a great choice for users who prioritize long battery life, a vibrant display, and a more budget-friendly price point, without sacrificing style.