vivo X80 Pro vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Android
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw speed, gaming, and incredibly fast charging, the vivo X80 Pro is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 6 Pro excels in camera versatility, AI-powered features, and a clean, long-term software support commitment, making it ideal for photography enthusiasts and those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X80 | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International, China | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 25 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 29 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm or 8.8 mm | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 203 g / 206 g (7.16 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR, 1500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), OriginOS Ocean (China) | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min Reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Urban Blue, Orange | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | V2183A, V2144 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 560 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X80
- Significantly faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially superior gaming performance with Dimensity 9000
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Software support may not be as long-term as Google's
- Camera processing may not appeal to those preferring natural tones
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality and computational photography
- Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates
- Unique AI features like Magic Eraser and Real Tone
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Tensor chip may not match Dimensity 9000 in raw performance
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 6 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 846 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the X80 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, vivo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The Pixel 6 Pro’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio, typical of OLED displays, delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. The absence of LTPO information for the X80 Pro means it may not dynamically adjust refresh rates as efficiently as some competitors, potentially impacting battery life during variable content viewing. The Pixel 6 Pro’s larger display size (6.71 inches vs. likely 6.78 inches for the X80 Pro) may appeal to media consumers.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s Tensor chip to deliver exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While specific sensor details for the X80 Pro are missing, vivo often focuses on large sensors and advanced image stabilization. The Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing emphasizes realistic colors and dynamic range, while vivo tends towards more vibrant, saturated images. The Pixel 6 Pro’s Magic Eraser and Real Tone features are unique selling points, offering powerful editing capabilities and accurate skin tone representation. Without detailed camera specs for the X80 Pro, it’s difficult to definitively assess its low-light performance or zoom capabilities.
Performance
The vivo X80 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 9000, fabricated on a 4nm process, offers a theoretical performance advantage over the Google Tensor’s 5nm node due to its newer architecture and higher clock speeds (3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 vs 2.80 GHz Cortex-X1). The Dimensity 9000’s CPU configuration – 1x Cortex-X2, 3x Cortex-A710, and 4x Cortex-A510 – is geared towards sustained performance. The Tensor chip, while capable, prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks. The X80 Pro is likely to exhibit superior GPU performance, benefiting gamers and users of graphically intensive applications. However, the Tensor’s custom cores excel at on-device AI processing, enhancing features like voice recognition and image processing.
Battery Life
Both the vivo X80 Pro and Google Pixel 6 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life. However, their charging approaches differ dramatically. The X80 Pro’s 80W wired charging can replenish 50% of the battery in just 11 minutes, a significant advantage over the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes). The X80 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the Pixel 6 Pro’s wired reverse charging. The Pixel 6 Pro compensates with 23W wireless charging, while the X80 Pro also supports wireless reverse charging. The X80 Pro’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X80 Pro if you need a phone that can handle demanding tasks, extended gaming sessions, and requires minimal downtime thanks to its 80W charging. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a phone with exceptional camera capabilities, a seamless software experience, and benefit from Google’s exclusive AI features like Magic Eraser and Real Tone.