Xiaomi 12 Lite vs vivo X80 Lite: A Detailed Comparison for the Discerning Buyer
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 12 Lite emerges as the stronger contender. Its faster 67W charging, coupled with a slightly brighter display, provides a more convenient and visually appealing experience. While the vivo X80 Lite boasts respectable endurance, the Xiaomi’s quicker top-ups and marginally better screen make it the more practical choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X80 Lite | Xiaomi 12 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 22 | 2022, July 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 22 | Available. Released 2022, July 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.27 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 159.3 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.27 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Color changing back panel color | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 61% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 50% in 13 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Diamond Black, Sunrise Gold | Black, Lite Green, Lite Pink |
| Models | V2208 | 2203129G |
| Price | - | € 119.80 / $ 269.00 / £ 121.15 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 120h | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.3 LUFS (Average) | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 461428 (v9) GeekBench: 2023 (v5.1) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 528905 (v9) GeekBench: 2943 (v5.1) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X80 Lite
- Longer battery endurance (120h rating)
- Potentially more efficient chipset (Dimensity 900)
- More conservative design may appeal to some
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Lower peak display brightness
- Potentially less powerful GPU
Xiaomi 12 Lite
- Faster charging (67W, 50% in 13 min)
- Brighter display (824 nits)
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 778G)
- Shorter battery endurance (100h rating)
- Potentially less battery life in heavy use
- More modern design may not appeal to all
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 12 Lite boasts a brighter display, reaching 824 nits compared to the vivo X80 Lite’s 781 nits. This 43-nit difference translates to improved visibility under direct sunlight, a significant advantage for outdoor users. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical AMOLED performance. While neither device specifies refresh rate or panel technology (LTPO), the Xiaomi’s higher peak brightness provides a tangible benefit for everyday use and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Xiaomi’s history of prioritizing camera features in the mid-range, it’s reasonable to assume the 12 Lite may offer more sophisticated image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on digital stabilization, potentially impacting low-light video quality. We can safely assume both phones will include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the quality of these modes will likely vary.
Performance
Both phones utilize 6nm process nodes, but the chipsets differ significantly. The Xiaomi 12 Lite features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (SM7325), with a CPU configuration of 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55. The vivo X80 Lite is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 900, employing 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Snapdragon 778G’s inclusion of three additional Cortex-A78 cores at a slightly higher clock speed suggests a potential edge in multi-threaded tasks and sustained performance, though real-world differences may be subtle. The Xiaomi’s Adreno 642L GPU is also generally considered more capable than the Dimensity 900’s Mali-G68 MC4.
Battery Life
The vivo X80 Lite claims an endurance rating of 120 hours, while the Xiaomi 12 Lite manages 100 hours. This suggests the vivo offers superior battery life, but this is a lab-based metric. The Xiaomi 12 Lite compensates with significantly faster charging: 67W wired, achieving 50% charge in just 13 minutes, compared to the vivo’s 44W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 61%. This difference in charging speed is a major advantage for the Xiaomi, mitigating the slightly lower endurance rating. The Xiaomi also supports PD3.0 and QC4 charging standards, offering broader compatibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X80 Lite if you prioritize long-term battery endurance and prefer a slightly more conservative design. It’s ideal for users who aren’t heavy gamers or frequent fast-chargers. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Lite if you value faster charging speeds, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more modern aesthetic. This phone is better suited for users who actively consume media and appreciate quick power-ups.