vivo X80 Lite vs vivo X90 Pro+: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X90 Pro+ is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster processor, superior camera system, and faster charging. However, the X80 Lite offers impressive battery life and a bright display at a much lower price point, making it a compelling option for budget-conscious users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X80 Lite | vivo X90 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 22 | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 22 | Available. Released 2022, December 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.27 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, Funtouch (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| Color changing back panel color | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 61% in 30 min | 80W wired, 100% in 33 min (advertised) 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Diamond Black, Sunrise Gold | Black, Red |
| Models | V2208 | V2227A |
| Price | - | About 1030 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 120h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.3 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 461428 (v9) GeekBench: 2023 (v5.1) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo X80 Lite
- Exceptional battery life
- Bright display
- Affordable price
- Decent camera
- Less powerful processor
- Subpar camera compared to flagship
- Limited advanced features
vivo X90 Pro+
- Flagship performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Superior camera system
- Fast charging (wired & wireless)
- Premium design and build quality
- High price
- Potentially shorter battery life than X80 Lite
Display Comparison
The X90 Pro+ likely features a more advanced display panel (likely LTPO AMOLED) with smoother refresh rates and better color accuracy than the X80 Lite's AMOLED. While the X80 Lite boasts a respectable 781 nits of peak brightness, the X90 Pro+ likely surpasses this with superior HDR performance and potentially a higher refresh rate for smoother scrolling and animations. Contrast ratio is likely superior on the X90 Pro+.
Camera Comparison
The X90 Pro+’s camera system is expected to be vastly superior. It likely features a larger sensor, improved image processing, and advanced features like enhanced night mode and better zoom capabilities. While the X80 Lite offers decent photo and video capabilities, it can't compete with the flagship-level camera system of the X90 Pro+. Expect better dynamic range, detail, and low-light performance from the X90 Pro+.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the X90 Pro+ is a generational leap over the Dimensity 900 in the X80 Lite. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the X90 Pro+. The X80 Lite is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
The X80 Lite's endurance rating of 120h is exceptional, suggesting incredible battery efficiency. The X90 Pro+ offers faster wired (80W) and wireless (50W) charging, allowing for quicker top-ups. While the X90 Pro+ likely has a smaller battery capacity, its charging speed compensates for it.
Buying Guide
The vivo X80 Lite is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life, a vibrant display, and a more affordable price tag. It's a great choice for everyday use and casual photography. The vivo X90 Pro+ is for power users, photography enthusiasts, and those who demand the absolute best performance and camera capabilities, regardless of cost.