vivo X80 Lite vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo emerges as the better choice. Its significantly brighter display (1004 nits vs 781 nits) and substantially faster 68W charging (vs 44W) offer tangible benefits in everyday use, outweighing the X80 Lite’s slightly more powerful CPU core clock speeds.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X80 Lite | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 22 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 22 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.27 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Color changing back panel color | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 61% in 30 min | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Diamond Black, Sunrise Gold | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | V2208 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | - | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 120h | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.3 LUFS (Average) | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 461428 (v9) GeekBench: 2023 (v5.1) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X80 Lite
- Slightly more powerful CPU cores
- Higher endurance rating (on paper)
- Proven Mediatek Dimensity 900 platform
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- No wireless charging
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Significantly brighter display (1004 nits)
- Much faster 68W wired charging
- Wireless charging support
- Slightly less powerful CPU cores
- Lower endurance rating (on paper)
- Snapdragon 695 is a lower tier chipset
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a considerable advantage in display brightness, reaching a measured 1004 nits compared to the vivo X80 Lite’s 781 nits. This translates to significantly better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical OLED characteristics. While neither manufacturer specifies panel technology (LTPO or not), the brightness difference is the key differentiator, making the Edge 30 Neo more comfortable to use in bright environments. The X80 Lite's lower brightness may necessitate higher brightness settings, impacting battery life.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature similar mid-range camera systems. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout performer in photography. Focusing on the chipset's ISP capabilities, Qualcomm's Snapdragon 695 generally offers more advanced image processing features, potentially giving the Edge 30 Neo a slight edge in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions.
Performance
Both phones utilize 6nm process nodes, but the chipsets differ significantly. The vivo X80 Lite’s Mediatek Dimensity 900 features a dual-cluster CPU configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While the X80 Lite’s A78 cores have a slight clock speed advantage, the Snapdragon 695 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized architecture and 5G modem integration. Real-world performance differences will likely be subtle, with the X80 Lite potentially edging out in CPU-intensive tasks, but the Edge 30 Neo offering a smoother experience with 5G connectivity.
Battery Life
The vivo X80 Lite claims an endurance rating of 120 hours, while the Motorola Edge 30 Neo scores 104 hours. However, endurance ratings are based on simulated usage. The Edge 30 Neo compensates for its slightly smaller battery with significantly faster charging: 68W wired and 5W wireless, achieving 61% charge in 30 minutes on the X80 Lite versus a much faster full charge on the Edge 30 Neo. This faster charging is a major convenience factor, mitigating the difference in overall endurance. The Edge 30 Neo’s wireless charging capability is also a unique advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X80 Lite if you prioritize sustained CPU performance for demanding tasks and value a proven track record of endurance with its 120-hour battery rating. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display, faster charging speeds, and a more modern aesthetic, even if it means a slightly shorter battery life and a less powerful CPU.