Xiaomi 11T Pro vs vivo X70: Which Flagship Delivers the Best Performance and Value?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing ultimate charging speed and peak performance, the Xiaomi 11T Pro is the clear winner. Its 120W charging and Snapdragon 888 chipset offer a noticeable advantage. However, the vivo X70 provides a more refined camera experience and a potentially more stable long-term performance profile due to the Dimensity 1200's thermal characteristics.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 | Xiaomi 11T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 30 | Available. Released 2021, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181/182 g (6.42 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, Dolby Vision, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 40 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 72% in 10 min, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | 4400 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue |
| Models | V2133A, V2104 | 2107113SG, 2107113SI, 2107113SR |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 139.00 / $ 185.21 / £ 189.99 / ₹ 39,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
vivo X70
- Excellent camera system (based on brand reputation)
- Potentially better sustained performance due to Dimensity 1200's thermal profile
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Slower 44W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than Xiaomi 11T Pro
Xiaomi 11T Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Snapdragon 888 prone to thermal throttling
- Image processing may be overly saturated for some users
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 11T Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 837 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight compared to the vivo X70 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the Xiaomi’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a deeper black level. The absence of refresh rate data for the X70 means the 11T Pro likely has an advantage in smoothness, assuming a standard 120Hz panel. Bezels are assumed to be comparable given the market segment, but the Xiaomi’s brightness gives it a clear edge for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as having strong camera systems, but details are limited. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, vivo historically prioritizes camera performance, and the X70 likely benefits from their image processing expertise. The Xiaomi 11T Pro’s camera is capable, but often leans towards a more saturated, punchy look. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device makes it impossible to assess low-light performance accurately. We can assume both offer capable video recording, but the X70’s potential for more natural image processing could be preferred by photography enthusiasts.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 11T Pro’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) offers a theoretical performance advantage over the vivo X70’s Dimensity 1200 (6nm). The Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.84 GHz, is designed for peak performance, while the Dimensity 1200 relies on a cluster of Cortex-A78 cores. However, the 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 888 provides better power efficiency, but is known to throttle under sustained load. The Dimensity 1200, while slightly less powerful on paper, may offer more consistent performance over extended gaming sessions due to its larger 6nm node. Both phones utilize similar RAM configurations (LPDDR5 assumed), but thermal management will be the deciding factor for sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 92 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the vivo X70’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Xiaomi 11T Pro’s 120W charging is a game-changer, delivering a full charge in just 17 minutes, and 72% in 10 minutes. The vivo X70’s 44W charging is comparatively slow, requiring significantly longer to reach 100%. The 5W reverse wired charging on the X70 is a niche feature, useful for topping up accessories, but the 11T Pro doesn’t offer this functionality. The Xiaomi’s charging speed effectively mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X70 if you need a consistently excellent camera system, appreciate a more balanced thermal profile for sustained performance, and don't mind slightly slower charging. Buy the Xiaomi 11T Pro if you prioritize blazing-fast 120W charging, demand the highest possible benchmark scores, and are willing to potentially manage thermal throttling during extended, intensive tasks.