vivo X70 vs vivo X80 Lite: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X70 boasts a more powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset, offering superior performance. However, the X80 Lite shines with its impressive 120h endurance rating and brighter display. For performance enthusiasts, the X70 wins; for battery life and display, the X80 Lite takes the lead.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 | vivo X80 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2022, September 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 30 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.27 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181/182 g (6.42 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 40 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | - |
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Color changing back panel color | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 44W wired, 61% in 30 min |
| Type | 4400 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Diamond Black, Sunrise Gold |
| Models | V2133A, V2104 | V2208 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 120h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 461428 (v9) GeekBench: 2023 (v5.1) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 1200)
- Potentially better camera system with gimbal
- Excellent AMOLED display
- Faster performance for gaming
- Likely shorter battery life than X80 Lite
- May be more expensive
vivo X80 Lite
- Exceptional battery life (120h endurance)
- Brighter display (781 nits)
- More affordable
- Fast charging (61% in 30 min)
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Potentially less advanced camera features
- Lower performance for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
The vivo X80 Lite takes the display crown with a measured 781 nits max brightness, significantly brighter than the X70. While the X80 Lite boasts an 'infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term), the X70's AMOLED panel still delivers excellent color accuracy and deep blacks. Both phones likely feature a 6.4-inch or similar display size, but the X80 Lite's brightness advantage is noticeable in outdoor conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed with strong camera capabilities, but specifics are limited. The X70 likely features a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including a gimbal stabilization system (common in vivo X series). The X80 Lite's camera is likely competent, but may lack the advanced features and image processing of the X70. Low-light performance is likely better on the X70.
Performance
Here, the vivo X70 pulls ahead. Its Dimensity 1200 chipset is noticeably more powerful than the X80 Lite's Dimensity 900. Expect smoother app loading, faster gaming frame rates, and better overall responsiveness on the X70. The X80 Lite is still capable for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The vivo X80 Lite is the clear winner in battery life. Its advertised 120h endurance rating is exceptional, suggesting significantly longer usage between charges compared to the X70. While the X70's 44W charging is respectable, the X80 Lite's 44W charging also reaches 61% in 30 minutes, making it competitive.
Buying Guide
The vivo X70 is ideal for users who prioritize performance, gaming, and smoother multitasking. The vivo X80 Lite is a great choice for those who value exceptional battery life, a vibrant display, and a more budget-friendly price point.