vivo X70 vs vivo X70 Pro+: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X70 Pro+ is the clear winner, boasting a Snapdragon 888+ chipset, superior camera system (especially with its gimbal stabilization), faster charging, and wireless charging. However, the X70 remains a compelling option for those seeking excellent camera performance at a more accessible price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 | vivo X70 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, September 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 30 | Available. Released 2021, September 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 164.5 x 75.2 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 181/182 g (6.42 oz) | 209 g / 213 g (7.37 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 11, Funtouch OS 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 40 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF, gimbal OIS |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 55W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Black, Blue, Orange |
| Models | V2133A, V2104 | V2145A, V2114 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 720 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 837833 (v9) GeekBench: 3469 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70
- Excellent camera for the price
- Smooth 120Hz display
- Stylish design
- Good battery life
- Less powerful chipset than Pro+
- No wireless charging
- Slower charging speeds
vivo X70 Pro+
- Flagship Snapdragon 888+ processor
- Exceptional camera with gimbal stabilization
- Fast wired and wireless charging
- Premium build quality
- Higher price
- Can be slightly bulky
- No significant design changes from X70
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. The X70 Pro+ boasts a slightly higher resolution and potentially better color accuracy, though both are excellent. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio mentioned for the X70 Pro+ is a marketing term, but generally indicates very deep blacks and excellent dynamic range.
Camera Comparison
This is where the X70 Pro+ truly shines. Its 50MP primary sensor with gimbal stabilization offers exceptional image stabilization and video recording capabilities. The X70 also has a capable camera system, but lacks the Pro+'s advanced hardware and software features. The X70 Pro+ generally produces more detailed and dynamic images, especially in low light.
Performance
The Snapdragon 888+ in the X70 Pro+ provides a significant performance advantage over the Dimensity 1200 in the X70. Expect faster app loading times, smoother gaming, and better overall responsiveness on the Pro+ model. While the X70 is still capable, the Pro+ handles demanding tasks with greater ease.
Battery Life
The X70 Pro+ has a slightly larger battery capacity and faster wired charging (55W vs 44W). The addition of 50W wireless charging on the Pro+ is a significant convenience. Both phones offer reverse wireless charging, but the Pro+'s 50W capability is considerably faster.
Buying Guide
The vivo X70 is ideal for users prioritizing a balance of camera quality, performance, and affordability. It's a great choice for everyday photography and smooth multitasking. The vivo X70 Pro+ is for photography enthusiasts and power users who demand the absolute best in camera technology, processing power, and charging convenience, and are willing to pay a premium.