vivo X70 vs vivo X70 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X70 Pro offers a superior camera system, brighter display, and potentially a more powerful chipset (Exynos 1080 in China). However, the X70 remains a compelling option with a slightly more accessible price point and similar core performance. The Pro is the clear winner for photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 | vivo X70 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 3, 5, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, September 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 30 | Available. Released 2021, September 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 158.3 x 73.2 x 8 mm (6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181/182 g (6.42 oz) | 183/184/185/186 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - China |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) - InternationalExynos 1080 (5 nm) - China |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 - InternationalMali-G78 MP10 - China |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 40 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 44W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4400 mAh | 4450 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White |
| Models | V2133A, V2104 | V2134A, V2105 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 1040 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 694499 (v9) GeekBench: 2956 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70
- More affordable
- Solid all-around performance
- Good camera system
- 120Hz display
- Less impressive camera than Pro
- Lower peak brightness display
- No periscope zoom lens
vivo X70 Pro
- Superior camera system with gimbal stabilization and periscope zoom
- Brighter display
- Potentially faster chipset (Exynos 1080 in China)
- Excellent image processing
- More expensive
- Slightly larger size
Display Comparison
The vivo X70 features a 6.56-inch FHD+ AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate. The X70 Pro boasts a slightly larger 6.58-inch FHD+ AMOLED display, also with a 120Hz refresh rate, but with a significantly higher peak brightness of 993 nits (measured) compared to the X70's likely lower figure. The Pro's contrast ratio is also listed as 'Infinite,' suggesting exceptional blacks and vibrant colors. The Pro's display is noticeably superior.
Camera Comparison
This is where the X70 Pro truly shines. While the X70 has a capable camera system (typically a 64MP main, 12MP ultrawide, and 2MP macro), the Pro features a more advanced setup, often including a 50MP main sensor with gimbal stabilization, a 12MP ultrawide, and a 8MP periscope telephoto lens for impressive zoom capabilities. The Pro's image processing is also generally considered superior, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 1200 chipset. However, the X70 Pro in China utilizes the Exynos 1080, which offers a slight performance edge. Both devices handle everyday tasks and gaming smoothly, but the Pro's chipset provides a bit more headroom for demanding applications. RAM and storage configurations are similar across both models.
Battery Life
Both phones have a 4400mAh battery and support 44W wired charging. The endurance rating of 123h suggests comparable battery life for both devices, indicating efficient power management despite the Pro's brighter display.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo X70? Users prioritizing value and a solid all-around experience without needing the absolute best camera. Who should buy the vivo X70 Pro? Photography enthusiasts, those wanting a brighter display, and users in China who benefit from the Exynos 1080 chipset.