vivo X70 vs vivo X60t Pro+: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X60t Pro+ generally edges out the X70 thanks to its Snapdragon 888 chipset, faster charging, and potentially superior camera capabilities. However, the X70 remains a compelling option, especially if you prioritize a slightly more refined design and potentially better software support.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 | vivo X60t Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, June 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 30 | Available. Released 2021, June 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 181/182 g (6.42 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 40 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, color spectrum |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 55W wired |
| Type | 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Orange, Emperor Blue |
| Models | V2133A, V2104 | V2056A |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 650 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) |
vivo X70
- Stylish design
- Good camera performance
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Potentially better software support
- Less powerful chipset than X60t Pro+
- Slower charging speed
- May lack some advanced camera features
vivo X60t Pro+
- Powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Faster 55W charging
- Potentially superior camera system
- Excellent gaming performance
- Design might be less refined than X70
- Software support may be shorter than X70
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with high refresh rates (likely 120Hz). The X60t Pro+ might have a slightly brighter display due to its Snapdragon 888, but both offer vibrant colors and smooth visuals. Screen sizes are likely similar, around 6.5-6.7 inches.
Camera Comparison
Both vivo phones are known for their excellent camera systems. The X60t Pro+ likely boasts a more advanced primary sensor and potentially better image processing thanks to the Snapdragon 888. Both will likely feature excellent portrait modes and video recording capabilities. Expect gimbal stabilization on both.
Performance
The Snapdragon 888 in the X60t Pro+ is significantly more powerful than the Dimensity 1200 in the X70. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the X60t Pro+. The Dimensity 1200 is still capable, but it won't match the raw power of the Snapdragon.
Battery Life
The X60t Pro+ has a clear advantage with its 55W wired charging compared to the X70's 44W. Both phones likely have similar battery capacities (around 4200-4400mAh), so the X60t Pro+ will charge significantly faster.
Buying Guide
The vivo X70 is ideal for users seeking a stylish phone with a good camera and reliable performance for everyday tasks. The X60t Pro+ is for power users and photography enthusiasts who demand top-tier performance, faster charging, and a more advanced camera system.