vivo consistently delivers stylish and feature-rich smartphones. The X70 and V27 Pro are two compelling options, but cater to slightly different needs. This detailed comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 Pro emerges as the stronger contender thanks to its significantly faster Dimensity 8200 chipset, brighter display, and faster 66W charging. While the X70 offers a solid experience, the V27 Pro's upgrades make it the more appealing choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 30 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181/182 g (6.42 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| | - | Color changing back panel color |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 40 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | - |
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min, 72% in 30 min |
| Type | 4400 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Magic Blue, Noble Black |
| Models | V2133A, V2104 | V2230 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.1 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 846767 (v9)
GeekBench: 3933 (v5.1), 3421 (v6)
GFXBench: 57fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70
- Potentially refined camera system (gimbal stabilization)
- Balanced performance
- Stylish design
- Older chipset
- Slower charging
- Less bright display
vivo V27 Pro
- Faster Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Brighter display
- Faster 66W charging
- Modern design
- Camera performance may not be as specialized as X70
- Potential for software bloat (common in vivo phones)
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 Pro boasts a significant advantage with its 978 nits max brightness, offering better visibility in sunlight compared to the X70. While the X70's display is perfectly adequate, the V27 Pro's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests deeper blacks and richer colors. Both likely use AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems. The X70 is known for its gimbal stabilization, potentially offering smoother video recording. The V27 Pro likely focuses on vibrant and shareable photos. Detailed camera comparisons would require extensive testing, but the V27 Pro's newer sensor technology may provide an edge in low-light conditions.
Performance
The Dimensity 8200 in the V27 Pro is a substantial upgrade over the Dimensity 1200 in the X70. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the V27 Pro. The X70 still provides a capable experience for everyday tasks, but the V27 Pro is in a different league.
Battery Life
Both phones claim impressive endurance ratings (121h), suggesting excellent battery life. However, the V27 Pro's 66W charging is considerably faster than the X70's 44W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo X70 is a good choice for users prioritizing a balanced experience and potentially a slightly more refined camera system (depending on specific photography preferences). The vivo V27 Pro is ideal for those who demand top-tier performance, a vibrant display, and rapid charging capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo X70 still a good phone in 2024?
Yes, the vivo X70 remains a capable phone, especially if you find it at a discounted price. However, the V27 Pro offers significant upgrades in performance and charging.
❓ Which vivo phone has better low-light camera performance?
While both have good low-light capabilities, the vivo V27 Pro's newer sensor technology likely gives it a slight edge.
