vivo consistently delivers stylish and feature-rich smartphones. The X70 and V25 Pro are two compelling options, each with its strengths. This detailed comparison will break down their key differences to help you decide which one best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V25 Pro edges out the X70 thanks to its faster 66W charging, brighter display, and slightly more modern chipset (Dimensity 1300). While the X70 offers a refined design, the V25 Pro provides a more well-rounded package for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2022, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 30 | Available. Released 2022, August 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181/182 g (6.42 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| | - | Color changing back panel color
Resistant to drops, scratches, and sweat |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 40 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | - |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 40% in 15 min, 71% in 30 min |
| Type | 4400 mAh | 4830 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Pure Black, Sailing Blue |
| Models | V2133A, V2104 | V2158 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.3 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 704090 (v9)
GeekBench: 2521 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo X70
- Premium design and build quality
- Excellent camera tuning and gimbal stabilization
- Refined software experience
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Potentially lower display brightness
- Older chipset (Dimensity 1200)
vivo V25 Pro
- Faster charging (66W)
- Brighter display (805 nits)
- More recent chipset (Dimensity 1300)
- Impressive battery life (101h endurance)
- Design might be less premium than X70
- Camera tuning potentially not as refined as X70
- Infinite contrast ratio is nominal and may not translate to significant real-world difference
Display Comparison
The vivo V25 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 805 nits peak brightness compared to the X70's likely lower brightness (spec not provided, but generally lower). The V25 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors. Both phones likely feature AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates, but the V25 Pro's brightness advantage is noticeable in outdoor conditions.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X70 is known for its excellent camera tuning and gimbal stabilization, particularly in its main lens. While both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, the X70 likely has a more refined image processing pipeline. The V25 Pro's camera system is also strong, but may not match the X70's overall image quality, especially in low light. Specific sensor details are needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
Both phones utilize Mediatek Dimensity chipsets with similar CPU configurations (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). However, the V25 Pro's Dimensity 1300 offers a slight performance advantage over the X70's Dimensity 1200, translating to marginally faster app loading and smoother multitasking. Both should handle everyday tasks and moderate gaming with ease.
Battery Life
The vivo V25 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The X70's battery capacity is likely similar, but the V25 Pro's optimized software and efficient chipset contribute to its superior endurance. The V25 Pro's 66W charging is a significant advantage, charging to 40% in 15 minutes and 71% in 30 minutes, while the X70 offers 44W charging.
Buying Guide
The vivo X70 is ideal for users prioritizing a premium design and a well-tuned camera system, especially if fast charging isn't a top priority. The vivo V25 Pro is a better choice for those seeking a vibrant display, rapid charging, and a more recent chipset, all while maintaining a stylish aesthetic.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The vivo V25 Pro boasts a significantly better endurance rating (101h) and faster charging (66W) compared to the vivo X70.
❓ Is the Dimensity 1300 chipset in the V25 Pro a big upgrade over the Dimensity 1200 in the X70?
While both chipsets are capable, the Dimensity 1300 offers a slight performance advantage, resulting in marginally faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
