vivo X70 vs Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G: Which Snapdragon/Dimensity Flagship Reigns Supreme?

The vivo X70 and Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon variant) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range flagship space. Both devices aim to deliver a premium experience without the top-tier price tag, but they achieve this through different approaches – the X70 with MediaTek’s Dimensity 1200 and the Reno6 Pro 5G with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 870. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) emerges as the slightly stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset offers a more consistently smooth experience, particularly in sustained workloads, and the 65W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the X70 has a capable camera, the Reno6 Pro’s overall package provides a more balanced experience.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo X70 Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2021, September 092021, September 09
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, September 30Available. Released 2021, September 09
Body
Build-Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back
Dimensions160.1 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 in)160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight181/182 g (6.42 oz)188 g (6.63 oz)
Display
Resolution1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)
Size6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm)Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
GPUMali-G77 MC9Adreno 650
OSAndroid 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China)Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM
 -UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesZeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panoramaColor spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad40 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro)
Single-32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRPanorama
Single32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavICGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging44W wired 5W reverse wired65W wired 5W reverse wired
Type4400 mAhLi-Po 4500 mAh
Misc
ColorsCosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, WhiteArctic Blue, Lunar Grey
ModelsV2133A, V2104CPH2247
PriceAbout 520 EURAbout 230 EUR
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 108h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -27.1 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 671577 (v9) GeekBench: 2941 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo X70

  • Potentially more refined camera image processing
  • 6nm Dimensity 1200 offers theoretical efficiency gains
  • Sleek design (based on brand aesthetic)

  • Slower 44W charging
  • Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
  • Limited display brightness information

Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)

  • Faster 65W charging for quick top-ups
  • Snapdragon 870 provides consistent performance
  • Brighter 780 nit display for outdoor use

  • May not have the same camera processing finesse as the X70
  • Snapdragon 870 is an older chipset
  • Design may be less striking to some users

Display Comparison

The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 780 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the X70. This difference translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both displays likely feature high contrast ratios (Oppo explicitly states 'Infinite'), the Reno6 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The lack of detailed display specs for the X70 (like refresh rate or panel type) leaves a gap in the comparison, but both are expected to offer vibrant colors typical of modern OLED panels.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are marketed as camera-centric, but specifics are limited. The X70’s camera system is likely to emphasize computational photography and image processing, leveraging MediaTek’s ISP capabilities. The Reno6 Pro 5G, while also focusing on photo and video, benefits from Qualcomm’s Snapdragon ISP. Without detailed sensor size information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the Reno6 Pro’s video capabilities are likely to be stronger due to Qualcomm’s established expertise in this area. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely irrelevant; image quality from such sensors is typically underwhelming.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm) features a Kryo 585 CPU clocked up to 3.2 GHz, while the vivo X70 utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) with a Cortex-A78 prime core at 3.0 GHz. While the Dimensity 1200’s 6nm process *should* offer better efficiency, the Snapdragon 870’s architecture and Qualcomm’s optimization generally result in more sustained performance and less throttling under heavy load. The Snapdragon 870’s CPU clock speed is also higher. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the Reno6 Pro’s more efficient chipset will likely translate to better multi-tasking and smoother gaming over extended periods.

Battery Life

Both devices share a 5W reverse wired charging capability. However, the Reno6 Pro 5G’s 65W wired charging is a significant advantage over the X70’s 44W charging. This translates to a much faster 0-100% charge time – likely under 40 minutes for the Reno6 Pro versus closer to an hour for the X70. Both phones have an endurance rating of 108h, suggesting similar battery life despite the difference in charging speeds. The Reno6 Pro’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery life concerns, allowing for quicker top-ups throughout the day.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo X70 if you prioritize a potentially more refined camera experience and don't mind potentially encountering some thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. Buy the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) if you value consistent performance, faster charging, and a brighter display for outdoor visibility. The Reno6 Pro is the better all-rounder for power users.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Dimensity 1200 in the vivo X70 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 1200 is a capable chipset, but it's known to exhibit some thermal throttling under sustained heavy loads, such as extended gaming. While the 6nm process helps, the Snapdragon 870 in the Reno6 Pro 5G generally manages heat more effectively, leading to more consistent frame rates over longer periods.
❓ How much faster is the 65W charging on the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G compared to the 44W charging on the vivo X70 in real-world use?
The 65W charging on the Reno6 Pro 5G can typically charge the phone from 0-100% in around 35-40 minutes, while the X70’s 44W charging will likely take closer to 60-70 minutes. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the image processing on the vivo X70 noticeably different from the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G, and which is more 'natural' looking?
Vivo typically leans towards more vibrant and saturated colors in its image processing, while Oppo often aims for a more balanced and natural look. This is a subjective preference, but users who prefer realistic colors may find the Reno6 Pro 5G more appealing. Without side-by-side samples, it's difficult to quantify the difference.