vivo X70 vs Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G takes the lead with its significantly faster 65W charging and slightly more efficient chipset. However, the vivo X70 boasts a potentially superior camera system and a more refined design. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: speed or photography.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 | Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 7, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2020, December 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 30 | Available. Released 2021, January 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 159.7 x 73.2 x 7.6 mm (6.29 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181/182 g (6.42 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 40 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4350 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Astral Blue, Starry Black, Starry Dream, Star Wish Red |
| Models | V2133A, V2104 | PDSM00, PDST00, CPH2201 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 410 EUR |
vivo X70
- Potentially superior camera system
- Premium design and build quality
- Good display quality
- Refined software experience
- Slower charging speed compared to Reno5 Pro
- Dimensity 1200 may throttle under sustained load
- Availability may vary
Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- Efficient Dimensity 1000+ chipset
- Stylish design
- Good overall performance
- Camera may not be as impressive as vivo X70
- Software experience can be a bit cluttered
- May lack some of the premium materials used in the X70
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. The vivo X70 might have slightly better color accuracy due to vivo's calibration, but both provide an excellent viewing experience. Screen sizes are similar, around 6.4-6.5 inches.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X70 is expected to have a stronger camera system, particularly in low-light conditions, thanks to its larger sensor and potentially improved image processing algorithms. While both offer versatile camera setups (main, ultrawide, telephoto), the vivo X70's focus on photography is evident. Oppo's Reno series typically delivers consistent and pleasing images, but vivo aims for a more professional-grade experience.
Performance
The Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G's Dimensity 1000+ (7nm) generally outperforms the vivo X70's Dimensity 1200 (6nm) in sustained performance and efficiency. While the Dimensity 1200 has a higher peak clock speed, the 7nm process of the 1000+ contributes to better thermal management and power efficiency. Gaming performance is comparable, but the Reno5 Pro 5G might handle demanding titles slightly better.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G's 65W charging is a significant advantage, allowing for incredibly fast charging times (around 30-40 minutes for a full charge). The vivo X70's 44W charging is still respectable, but noticeably slower. Battery capacities are similar, around 4300-4400 mAh, so real-world battery life should be comparable, assuming similar usage patterns.
Buying Guide
The vivo X70 is ideal for photography enthusiasts who prioritize camera quality and a premium feel. The Oppo Reno5 Pro 5G is a better choice for users who value fast charging and efficient performance, especially those frequently on the go.