OnePlus 9RT 5G vs vivo X70: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak gaming performance and the fastest possible charging, the OnePlus 9RT 5G is the clear winner. However, the vivo X70 offers a more refined overall experience, particularly for those who value a balanced approach to performance and camera capabilities, making it ideal for everyday use and photography enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo X70 | OnePlus 9RT 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 09 | 2021, October 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 30 | Available. Released 2021, October 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 75.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 162.2 x 74.6 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181/182 g (6.42 oz) | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch OS 14 (International), OriginOS (China) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 40 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56”, 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 29 min |
| Type | 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White | Hacker Black, Nano Silver, Blue |
| Models | V2133A, V2104 | MT2110, MT2111 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 590 EUR |
vivo X70
- Significantly faster 65W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 processor
- Superior GPU performance for gaming
- Potentially higher thermal throttling under sustained load
- Lacks reverse wireless charging
OnePlus 9RT 5G
- More efficient Dimensity 1200 chipset
- Potentially better camera image processing
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Slower 44W charging
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature AMOLED panels (based on brand standards), the provided data doesn't detail display specifications. However, the chipset choice hints at different priorities. The Snapdragon 888 in the OnePlus 9RT is often paired with higher refresh rate displays (120Hz or higher) to maximize visual fluidity during gaming. The Dimensity 1200 in the vivo X70, while capable, might prioritize color accuracy and power efficiency. Without specific nit brightness or color gamut data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the 9RT likely targets a more visually stimulating experience.
Camera Comparison
The provided data lacks specific camera sensor details, making a direct comparison challenging. However, vivo is renowned for its camera technology, and the X70 likely benefits from advanced image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor sizes. While the 9RT’s Snapdragon ISP is capable, vivo’s focus on computational photography could give the X70 an edge in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Without knowing the megapixel counts or aperture values, it’s reasonable to assume the X70 prioritizes image fidelity, while the 9RT may lean towards a more versatile camera system. We'd need to see sample images to make a definitive judgment.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 9RT 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5nm) boasts a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, offering a significant advantage in single-core performance compared to the vivo X70’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm). The Snapdragon 888’s Adreno 660 GPU also provides superior graphics processing power. However, the Dimensity 1200’s 6nm process *should* translate to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. The 9RT’s raw power will benefit gamers and users running demanding applications, while the X70 aims for consistent performance across a wider range of tasks. Both utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the 9RT's superior SoC will likely yield faster overall system responsiveness.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 9RT 5G’s 65W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 29 minutes. This is a substantial advantage over the vivo X70’s 44W charging. While the X70’s 6nm Dimensity 1200 *may* offer slightly better battery life due to its efficiency, the 9RT’s faster charging significantly reduces downtime. The 5W reverse wired charging on the X70 is a niche feature, while the 9RT lacks this capability. For users constantly on the go, the 9RT’s charging speed is a major benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo X70 if you need a well-rounded flagship experience with a strong emphasis on camera quality and a more efficient chipset for all-day use. Buy the OnePlus 9RT 5G if you prefer uncompromising performance for demanding games and applications, and if minimizing charging time is a top priority. The 9RT is geared towards power users, while the X70 caters to a broader audience.